Page 178 - Master Handbook of Acoustics
P. 178

points if the distribution is normal (Gaussian), and reverberation data should qualify reasonably well.
  Table 9-1 shows an analysis of the reverberation times for the video studio plotted in Fig. 9-4. For
  the “panels reflective” condition at 500 Hz, the mean reverberation time is 0.56 second with a
  standard deviation of 0.06 second. For a normal distribution, 68% of the data points would fall

  between 0.50 and 0.62 second. That 0.06 standard deviation is 11% of the 0.56 mean. The
  percentages listed in Table 9-1 give us a rough appraisal of the precision of the mean.





































   TABLE 9-1 Reverberation Time of a Video Studio


      The columns of percentage in Table 9-1 are plotted in Fig. 9-5. Variability of reverberation time
  values at the higher frequencies settles to reasonably constant values of around of 3 to 6%. Because
  we know that each octave at high frequencies contains a large number of modes that results in smooth
  decays, we conclude that at higher audible frequencies essentially diffuse conditions exist, and that

  the 3 to 6% variability is normal experimental measuring variation. At low frequencies, however, the
  high percentages (high variabilities) are the result of greater mode spacing producing considerable
  variation in reverberation time from one position to another. These high percentages include the
  uncertainty in fitting a straight line to the uneven decay characteristic of low frequencies. However,
  as Fig. 9-4 showed, there are great differences in reverberation time between the three measuring
  positions. Therefore, for this studio for two different conditions of absorbance (panels open/closed),
  diffusion is poor at 63 Hz, somewhat better at 125 Hz, and reasonably good at 250 Hz and above.
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183