Page 34 -
P. 34

Ch04-I044963.fm  Page 17  Tuesday, August 1, 2006  6:33 PM
                                     1, 2006
                                          6:33 PM
                      Page 17
                           Tuesday, August
            Ch04-I044963.fm
                                                                                          17 17
                          Lyapunov Exponent Lateral  Lyapunov Exponent Vertical  Lyapunov Exponent  Anteroposterior
                      0.141               1  0.14                  J. 14
                                      1                     1                      t
                      0.12            1     0.12            1      0.12
                                      1      0.1            1                      1
                       0.1            i                     I       0.1
                      0.08   1              0.08   1 1             0.08
                                            0.06                   0.06
                      0.06
                                      1
                                            0.04            1      0.04
                      0.04            1                     J-
                                            0.02                                  _1_
                      0.02                                         0.02  J -
                           Young    Elderly       Young    Elderly      Young    Elderly
                  Figure  4:  Comparison  of Lyapunov  exponents  between  young  and  all  elder  subjects.  The  lower
                                 and  upperlines  of the  box  are  25th  amd  75th  percentiles.
                         Lyapunov Exponent Lateral  Lyapunov Exponent Vertical  Lyapunov Exponent Anteroposterior
                            T        +                                    t
                      0.12   1                                     0.12            -i-
                             1                                      0.1
                       0.1                                                1
                             i                                            1
                      0.08            1                            0.08
                      0.06                                         0.06
                             1
                      0.04                                         0.04
                             1
                      0.02  - I -     1                            0.02
                                     _l_                                          -L
                            Pre.     Post.        Pre.     Post.         Pre.     Post.
                       Figure  5:  Comparison  of Lyapunov  exponents  between  the  pre-intervention  and  the
                                        post-intervention  subject  in the  elderly.

                  box  are  the  25th  and  75th  percentiles.  The  line  in  the  middle  of  the  box  is  the  median.  The
                  wiskers shows the  extent  of the rest  of the data.  Elderly  subjects  generally  exhibited  higher  value
                  indicating  much  instability  in  all  direction,  but  no statistical  significance  was  observed  except  in
                  the  vertical  direction  (p  <0.05).  Figure  5  shows  the  average  value  of  the  estimated  Lyapunov
                  exponent  comparing  with  the  pre-intervention  and  the  post-intervention  in  elderly  subjects.  The
                  post-intervention  illustrates  significantly  smaller  value  of the  exponent  in  all direction  (p  <0.05).
                  The  result  suggested  that  the  method  feasibly  reveals  the  effects  of  the  interventions  on  the
                  improvement  of walking  stability  in  elderly.

                  In  the  experiment,  a  short  walking  distance  was  chosen  to  avoid  effects  of  fatigue  from  elderly
                  persons' walking.  It  is important  to mention that  estimation  of Lyapunov exponents  is sensitive to
                  the data  size and the observation time.  Therefore,  estimation  accuracy  of Lyapunov exponents was
                  rather  low in this study.  However,  we quantified  the exponential  rate  of divergence  of  trajectories,
                  which  followed  trends  of  Lyapunov  exponents.  The  proposed  method  was  adequate  to  quantify
                  the nature  of the  dynamic  system  while  walking.  A quantitative  measure  of the  walking  stability
                  may  provides  an  essential  tool  for  assessing  personnel  risk  of  falls,  designing  proper  treatments,
                  and  monitoring  progress  and  efficacy  of the  intervention.

                  CONCLUSION

                  This study  presented  a technique  for  assessing dynamic  stability  of walking  using nonlinear  time-
                  series  analysis  with  a  portable  instrument.  This  method  is  easily  applicable  and  reliable  in  the
                  clinical  field  and  daily  situations.  The  experimental  results  suggested  that  the  proposed  method
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39