Page 230 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research
P. 230

9. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION EFFECTS                             219

        Trends in Political Communication Research

        Several promising trends in political communication research can be
        noted. First, there has been some progress in connecting audience effects
        with other parts of the communication process: news sources, media orga-
        nizations, and content. Second, investigation at the macrosocial level of
        analysis has been revitalized to complement the already extensive
        research at the individual level. Coinciding with the resurgence of
        macrolevel concern, research making comparisons between communities,
        nations, and historical periods has also emerged (Bennett, 2000; Blumler,
        1983; Blumler, McLeod, & Rosengren, 1992; Tichenor, Donohue, & Olien,
        1980). A fourth trend is a renewed interest in language, not only the lan-
        guage of media content, but also language as it relates to the production
        and interpretation of mediated information. Fifth, there has been an
        increase in the number of studies that combine methodologies and/or use
        multiple sources of data to provide more complete answers to research
        questions. Sixth, there has been a rebirth of interest in issues of civic
        socialization and community. The final trend is the development of more-
        complex models of political communication processes. Each of the trends
        has been stimulated by the increasing complexity of the political environ-
        ment and has facilitated the growth of knowledge in the field.


          THE CHANGING CONTEXT OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION

        Political communication is shaped by several layers of systemic context.
        For instance, the sociopolitical environment in a given society structures
        the form and content of political communication processes. More specifi-
        cally, the media environment, both in terms of the context in which infor-
        mation is produced and in which it is disseminated to the public, is also
        an important determinant of the nature of political communication.
           U.S. society in the post–World War II era has been rapidly evolving in
        ways driven by increased education, suburbanization, and immigration,
        as well as by increasing disparity between rich and poor. Ethnic and racial
        heterogeneity has been rapidly expanding. Results of these changing cir-
        cumstances include increased tension in the political dialogue and a com-
        plication of political discourse. As society diversifies, the political system
        becomes less predictable. Party identification, along with voter turnout, is
        down, and split-ticket voting in a given election and party instability
        across elections are more common, leading to divided government at
        almost every level. Several prominent third party and independent candi-
        dates have exerted a visible effect on election outcomes (in some cases,
   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235