Page 249 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 249

Workplace/Employment: Overcoming Systemic Biases  223

                         First, while the criteria used to define leadership and managerial potential

                     might be applicable to some groups (White males), it might be biased and inap-
                     propriate for others. Women, for example, who use a much more collaborative
                     and relational approach to accomplishing goals as opposed to a competitive and
                     task - oriented one may be overlooked as leadership material. Asian American
                     employees who may  “ shun the spotlight ”  but be very effective in working behind
                     the scenes are not visible to those in positions who determine promotion.
                         Second, it must be noted that performance appraisal systems serve gate -
                      keeping functions that determine who is hired, retained, and promoted. If
                     they, themselves, are culture - bound and biased toward employees of color,
                     women, and LGBTs, disparities in employment will continue to exist. Programs,
                     policies, and practices flow from performance appraisal systems; they are

                     powerful organizational forces that determine who rises in an organization
                     and who does n o t. Changing these biased policies and practices requires con-
                     siderable work because a change in standards ultimately means that those
                     groups who have benefited may no longer enjoy an advantage over others

                     (Sue, 2008). Biased performance appraisal criteria have system - wide effects on
                     the workplace. They perpetuate  “ glass walls ”  and  “ glass ceilings ”  that foster
                     occupational segregation and restrict movement within a company, as well as
                     maintain the status quo within an organization (Rowe, 1990).


                       ADDRESSING MICROAGGRESSIONS IN
                     THE WORKPLACE

                       If racial, gender, and sexual - orientation microaggressions are so subtle and
                     disguised, how do companies begin to address the detrimental effects of their
                     workplace? What can business, industry, educational institutions, municipali-
                     ties, health care agencies, and governmental agencies do to make the workplace
                     more accepting and welcoming and ameliorate the harm of microaggressions?
                     Several important changes and activities can be undertaken to enhance the
                     valuing of underrepresented groups in work sites. Changes must occur at both
                     the systemic and individual levels.


                       WORKPLACE/EMPLOYMENT: OVERCOMING
                     SYSTEMIC BIASES AND MICROAGGRESSIONS

                       Studies on organizational culture, climate, and change suggest that work
                     environments, through their philosophy, vision statements, and values, can
                     directly affect the social identity contingencies of devalued groups in our







                                                                                    1/19/10   6:13:30 PM
          c10.indd   223                                                            1/19/10   6:13:30 PM
          c10.indd   223
   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254