Page 56 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 56

30  taxonomy of microaggressions

               microassaults (scrawling anti - Semitic graffiti in public restrooms or hanging a

               noose surreptitiously on the door of a Black colleague).
                   Second, perpetrators may engage in a microassault when they feel relatively
               safe, such as being in the presence of people who share their beliefs and atti-
               tudes or knowing that they can get away with their offensive words and deeds.
               Safety often relies on the inaction of others in the face of biased actions. In fact,
               studies reveal that people often overpredict whether they would take action
               against a biased action (hearing a racist comment). While they may condemn and
               say they would take appropriate action, when faced with the real situation they
               remain silent or inactive (Kawakami, Dunn, Karmali,  &  Dovidio, 2009). The
               following example is representative of this condition.
                    At a fraternity sports party, a group of White males were sitting around their
                  living room during a late Sunday afternoon, chugging down beer after beer
                  tapped from a keg. They had just finished watching the first half of a football


                  game and were obviously quite inebriated. Excitedly talking about the last play
                  from scrimmage that resulted in an incomplete pass, one of the boys exclaimed,
                   “ them niggers can ’ t play quarterback! ”  This brought out a howl of laughter, and
                  another member said,  “ That ’ s because they ’ re just jungle bunnies! ”  More laughter
                  erupted in the room and others produced a flurry of racial slurs:  “ monkey, ”

                    “ coon, ”     “ burr head, ”     “ oreo, ”  and  “ Uncle Tom ” ! Each slur brought on laughter
                  and renewed attempts to outdo one another in finding the most degrading

                  reference to Blacks. As they exhausted their list, the game became a form of free
                  association with blackness.  “ Black pussy, black sheep, criminal, rapist, castration,
                  welfare family, cattle prod, ”  and so on, they shouted. It was clear that some of
                  those in the group were quite uncomfortable with the game, but said nothing
                  and chuckled at the responses anyway. (Sue, 2003, p. 88)
                    Third, many people who privately hold notions of minority inferiority will
               only display their biased attitudes when they lose control. Our opening exam-
               ples of actors Michael Richards and Mel Gibson represent this condition. Neither
               had publicly displayed any attitudes/behaviors of racism, anti - Semitism, or
               sexism until they were caught in situations where conscious concealment and
               judgment broke down. In the case of Richards, the heckling by Black patrons
               so infuriated him that he simply  “ lost it ”  and exploded with anger expressed
               through racial epithets. In the case of Gibson, alcoholic intoxication so low-
               ered his inhibitions and defenses that he made statements that have haunted
               him since.
                    Microassaults are most similar to  “ old - fashioned ”  racism: they are the type
               the public generally associates with  “ true racism ” : direct, deliberate, obvious,










                                                                                    1/19/10   6:07:40 PM
          c02.indd   30                                                             1/19/10   6:07:40 PM
          c02.indd   30
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61