Page 27 -
P. 27

12                                                  W. van der Aalst et al.










                           Fig. 1.3 A Petri net for the Accident workflow













                           Fig. 1.4 A YAWL net for the Accident workflow


                           completion of this transition. Similarly, if a transition has multiple input places, this
                           represents a synchronization point as at least one token is required in each input
                           place for this transition to be enabled.
                              Figure 1.4 shows the YAWL representation of the Petri net of Fig. 1.3. As can
                           be seen, in a YAWL net, there is a more explicit representation of the join and split
                           behavior of the various tasks. In addition, there is no need to explicitly represent
                           all places; those that simply connect two tasks can be omitted. The YAWL model
                           captures the order in which the tasks need to be presented at runtime. To make
                           the specification available to the runtime environment, it needs to be specified in
                           the Editor, see Fig. 1.5, which can save the model in an XML format that can be
                           interpreted by the Engine. In addition, one needs to specify how work is assigned
                           to participants. To keep this example simple, let us assume that all tasks are to be
                           executed by the Claimant, which we have captured as a role with one participant.
                           Also, tasks are offered to the Claimant and he/she can choose when to start working
                           on them.
                              At runtime, the Engine uses the YAWL model to determine when certain tasks
                           are to be offered to the Claimant. In Fig. 1.6, one can see the worklist containing the
                           work items (i.e. task instances) offered to the Claimant after the task Obtain Quote
                           has been performed. Note that both options Buy New Car and Have Car Fixed are
                           offered and the Claimant needs to make a choice.
                              Assuming that the Claimant completed the choice for having their car fixed or
                           having the current one repaired, the task Settle Bill is offered. In Fig. 1.7, the data
                           input form for the corresponding work item is shown. One can see that performing
                           this work item involves filling in a number of data fields. The presentation of these
                           fields is governed by the type of the data involved (which in this example are all
                           simple types) and whether the fields contain editable values or are for presentation
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32