Page 215 - Modern Optical Engineering The Design of Optical Systems
P. 215

198   Chapter Nine

        Beam truncation
        The effect of beam truncation, i.e., stopping down or cutting off the
        outer regions of the beam, is discussed by Campbell and DeShazer.
        They show that if the diameter of the beam is not reduced below 2(2w),
                                                   2
        where w is the beam semidiameter at the 1/e points, then the beam
        intensity distribution remains within a few percent of a true gaussian
        distribution. If the clear aperture is reduced below this value, it will
        introduce structure (i.e., rings) into the irradiance patterns, and the
        pattern gradually approaches Eq. 9.14 as the aperture is reduced.
          A lens aperture large enough to pass a beam with a diameter of 4w
        is obviously very inefficient from a radiation transfer standpoint. For
        this reason, most systems truncate the beam, very often to the 1/e 2
        diameter, and the diffraction pattern is altered accordingly. If the beam
        is truncated down to 61 percent of the 1/e diameter, it is difficult to see
                                              2
        the difference from a uniform beam, with the ring disk and rings.

        Size and location of a new waist formed by
        a perfect optical system
        When a gaussian beam passes through an optical system, a new waist is
        formed. Its size and location are determined by diffraction (and not
        by the paraxial equations of Chap. 2). The “waist” and “focus” are at
        different locations; in a weakly convergent beam, the separation may
        be large. The following equations allow calculation of the new waist
        size and location:

                                             2
                                         2 xf
                                xr 5                                (9.28)
                                              2 2
                                     x 1 a  w 1  b
                                       2

                                     2  2           xr
                            2
                                                 2
                          w 2 5     f  w 1   5 w 1 a  b             (9.29)
                                         2  2      2x
                                x 1 a   w 1  b
                                  2

        where w 1   the radius (to the 1/e points) of the original waist
                                       2
               w 2   the radius of the new waist formed by the optical system
                f   the focal length of the lens
                x   the distance from the first focal point of the lens to the
                    plane of w 1
               x′   the distance from the second focal point of the lens to the
                    plane of w 2
        Note that x and x′ are usually negative and positive, respectively. Note
        also the similarity to the newtonian paraxial equation (Eq. 2.3).
   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220