Page 81 - Modern Optical Engineering The Design of Optical Systems
P. 81

64   Chapter Four

        We can write the first set in matrix notation as
                                u′
                                       1           y                (4.27)
                                                u

                                 y
                                       0     1
        The second set becomes
                                              u′
                                        1 0                         (4.28)
                                 u
                                  2

                                                1
                                 y
                                  2     d  1   y 1
        Substituting the left side of Eq. 4.27 into Eq. 4.28 and multiplying the
        two inner matrices, we get
                                     1
                                                  u
                              u
                                2

                                                   1
                               y
                                2    d  1   d     y 1
        which is the matrix form of Eqs. 4.1 and 4.2.
          This process can be chained to encompass an entire optical system if
        desired, and the final product of all the inner matrices can be interpreted
        to yield the cardinal points, focal lengths, etc., of the system.
          Note well that there is absolutely no magic in this process. The amount
        of computation involved is exactly the same as in the corresponding
        paraxial raytrace. To this author it seems far more informative to trace
        the ray paths and to have the added benefit of a knowledge of the
        paraxial ray heights and slopes. However, for those to whom matrix
        manipulation is second nature, this formulation has a definite appeal,
        although no advantage.

        4.4  The y-ybar Diagram
        The y-ybar diagram is a plot of the ray height y of an axial ray versus
        the ray height, ybar, of an oblique (i.e., principal or chief) ray. Thus each
        point on the plot represents a component (or surface) of the system.
          Figure 4.5a shows an erecting telescope and Fig. 4.5b shows the cor-
        responding y-ybar diagram. Note that point A in the y-ybar diagram
        corresponds to component  A, etc.  An experienced practitioner can
        quickly sketch up a system in y-ybar form in the same way that a system
        can be sketched using elements and rays.
          The reduction of either a y-ybar diagram or a sketch with rays to a
        set of numerical values for the component powers and spacings
        involves the same amount of computation in either case. Although the
        y-ybar diagram is simpler to draw than a ray sketch, there is obviously
        more information in the ray sketch, and an experienced practitioner
        can easily draw a ray sketch accurately enough to allow conclusions to
        be drawn as to its practicality, size, etc. which the y-ybar diagram does
        not readily provide.
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86