Page 63 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 63

44       Modern  Spatiotemporal  Geostatistics —  Chapter 2
















            Figure  2.11.  Distance in        Figure  2.12.  Distance  in
            the  sense  of  Equation  2.13.   the  sense  of  Equation  2.15.

        PI  to  PI  in  a  city.  Therefore,  this  distance  (Eq.  2.13)  may  be  more  appro-
        priate  for  processes that  actually  occur  on a discrete  grid  or  network  of  some
        sort  (however,  this  may not  be true  for  the  simulation  of  continuous processes
        by  means of  numerical  grids,  since  in  this  case  the  grid  is  only  a  convenient
        modeling device and does not  change the spatiotemporal metric).
        Yet  another  distance  \ds\  is defined by



        In  the  case  of  Figure  2.11,  Equation  2.14  gives  \ds\ =  |PiM|.  When  dealing
        with  distances  between  two  geographical  points  PI  and  P%  on  the  surface of
        the  Earth (consider a sphere with center O and radius r,  as shown in Fig.  2.12),
        the  arc  distance  \ds\  is defined  as the  length  of  the  smaller  arc of  the  great
        circle joining these two  points,  i.e.,



        where  dip  is the  radian  measure of the  angle PiOP 2.

        Finally,  Euclidean metrics are not usually the  most suitable measures of  distance
        in  fractal  spaces  (e.g.,  processes taking  place within  porous  media  are  more
        adequately  represented  by fractal  rather  than  Euclidean geometry).  There  is
        not  a general  expression of  the  metric  in fractal  spaces,  which  rather depends
        on the  physics of the situation  (Christakos  et al.,  2000a).  In fact, formulating
        explicit  metric  expressions (such as Eq.  2.12)  is  not  always  possible in  fractal
        spaces,  since the  physical  laws may not  be available in the  form  of  differential
        equations.  Geometric  patterns  in fractal  spaces are self-similar  (or statistically
        self-similar  in the  case of  random fractals)  over  a  range of  scales (Mandelbrot,
        1982;  Feder,  1988);  self-similarity  implies  that  fractional  (fractal)  exponents
        characterize the  scale dependence of geometric  properties.  A common example
        is the  percolation  fractal  generated  by random occupation  of sites or  bonds on
        a  discrete  lattice.  Length  and  distance  measures on  a  percolation  cluster,
        denoted  by f(r),  scale  as power  laws with  the  Euclidean  (linear)  size  of  the
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68