Page 71 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 71

52      Modern   Spatiotemporal  Geostatistics —  Chapter 2

         EXAMPLE  2.20:  In  the  relativistic  representation  of  space/time  a  composite
         (Riemannian)  metric (Eq. 2.27) is defined  as follows  (Chavel, 1995)




             The distance (Eq. 2.28) is obtained directly from  Equation 2.27 by letting
                 2
         9oo  =  —c , gn  =  1 (i  =  1, 2, 3; c is the speed of light)  and 5^  =  0 (i ^  j).
         This  space/time  distance  is  known  as the  Minkowski  metric  (for a  physical
         interpretation,  see Example 2.23 below).
             Riemann  has shown that  Equation  2.27 provides  a sufficient  but  not nec-
         essary  specification  that  satisfies  the  fundamental  requirements  of  a  metric
         (Weber,  1953).  The  metric  (Eq. 2.27) can  be  used  for  an extrinsic  (external)
         as  well  as an  intrinsic  (internal)  characterization  of  space/time,  where  the  <?».,•
        coefficients  are obtained from the available physical knowledge (measurements,
         laws,  etc.)  and  are, in  general,  functions  of  space  and  time.  In  the  case  of
        the  external  geometry  model,  a point  is defined  in space/time  using  Euclidean
        coordinates.  In the  case of the  intrinsic  geometry  model,  the  Riemannian coor-
        dinates of a point can be defined without knowledge of distances.  Then,  spatial
        distances  and  time  lags are calculated within  small  local  meshes using  an ex-
         pression of the  form  of  Equation  2.27,  where the  <?y  coefficients  may vary from
        one  mesh to  the  other.  These  coefficients  essentially  convert  the  increments
        of  Riemannian coordinates  in each  small local  mesh  into spatial  distances and
        time lags.

        Some    comments     on  physical spatiotemporal
        geometry

         By  way of  a summary,  in  modern  geostatistics  the  spatiotemporal  geometry  is
        generally  represented  by the  ordered  pair



        where  £  is a space/time  continuum,  each  point  of which  is associated with a
        set  of  coordinates  (Euclidean  or  non-Euclidean,  Cartesian  or  non-rectangular,
         etc.),  and  \dp\ denotes  a  suitable  space/time  metric  (separate or  composite,
         Euclidean  or  Riemannian,  etc.).  As  we  saw  above,  Newtonian  space/time
         requires two distinct structures to  be specified:  \ds\  and dt—see Equation  2.11.
         Minkowskian space/time, on the other  hand, involves one structure:  the  metric
        in  Equation 2.28.
            As far  as the  representation  of  physical knowledge  is concerned, the  exist-
        ing spatiotemporal  geometries  display  some important  differences.  Traditional
        geometries  roll  together  metrical  and  other  spatiotemporal  concepts,  which
         may  hamper  the  development  of  physics.  In  classical  geostatistics,  e.g.,  the
        spatiotemporal  continuum  is  routinely  covered  by  a  single  coordinate  system
        which  implies  a specified  metrical  structure (i.e.,  rectangular  coordinates with
        a  Euclidean  metric  defined  by the  inner  product)  and  no attempt  is  made  to
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76