Page 129 - Myths for the Masses An Essay on Mass Communication
P. 129

Mass Communication and the Meaning of Self in Society

             Similarly, the perception of space may be significantly altered by
           film or television productions with the aid of lenses, combinations
           of shots, or even morphing. Types of shots are indicators of moods
           or conditions; for instance, Jean-Luc Godard once said that the
           close-up was invented for tragedy and the long shot for comedy,
           suggesting the range of technical choices for setting a scene. In fact,
           close-ups accentuate the (disembodied) face, without context but
           recognizable nevertheless. Close-ups are rarely achieved in real life,
           but an emphasis on the face reflects the cultural practices of con-
           temporary mass communication. The media celebrate the face,
           which replaces the idea and serves to identify the individual with a
           cause while suggesting proximity, even intimacy, particularly in life-
           size representations on television screens.
             In addition, montage fragments and reassembles reality to recon-
           stitute time and space in narrative patterns, beyond the notion of
           merely editing a film sequence, and to provide an intellectual marker
           for contrast or conflict; an example is the originality of Sergei
           Eisenstein’s work, which is grounded in the dialectical – the con-
           flict of opposites. The disruption of the time continuum and the
           dissection of the spatial totality contain the substance for con-
           structing meaning, which arises – in the readings of the spectator –
           from relationships among images that constitute the flow of the
           visual narrative.
             But the notion of space beyond its physical or geographical def-
           initions also includes the recognition of privacy as a constituent of
           social space. Mass communication typically crosses the boundaries
           of social space, technically through the process of dissemination and
           discursively through creative practices that invoke rights and insist
           on public interest. Indeed, mass communication, with its institu-
           tional regime of publicity, opposes the very notion of privacy by
           pursuing strategies of disclosure in the arena of information
           exchange, while elaborating on the conditions of privacy in fictional
           accounts with strategies of inclusion that obscure the difference
           between private and public and allow audiences to explore the
           intimacy of the other, including private thoughts.
             When the need to protect privacy becomes an argument against
           the intrusion of mass communication, however, legal protection



                                        117
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134