Page 29 - Myths for the Masses An Essay on Mass Communication
P. 29

Mass Communication and the Promise of Democracy

           raises questions about the most rational – that is, accountable and
           regulated – control over mass communication to secure a democ-
           ratic existence.
             Finally, there is the notion of defining by doing, which introduces
           a personal dimension to a search for meanings of mass communi-
           cation that escapes any institutionally grounded, historical claim to
           a definition, since it is identified with particular choices of respec-
           tive users. What emerges from such an approach is a litany of
           individual preferences that range from bourgeois self-interest in per-
           petuating or preserving specific social or political conditions to the
           interests of the oppressed or marginalized, whose own choices vary
           with the details of their oppositional stance.
             In any case, these defining instances of media functions also
           include the creative applications by a public who may be more
           interested in background noise, moving color images, or wrapping-
           paper – among other self-defined objectives – than in the actual
           reception of information or entertainment, for instance. Although
           far removed from any original intent of their producers, these media
           uses do occur, and their histories need to be written for cultural
           balance in traditional versions of mass communication history which
           typically celebrate the process of production rather than the manner
           of consumption and, thus, favor an institutional rather than an indi-
           vidual biography.


                                         III


           Indeed, while mass communication figures prominently in the his-
           tory of cultural evolution and social advancement, it is not entirely
           a story of betterment or progress, nor is it one in which progress
           is an entirely Western achievement. Instead, it is the story of a uni-
           versal struggle, in which communication in its technical manifesta-
           tion is the outcome of creative labor in many parts of the world,
           albeit more often than not for similar purposes of social or politi-
           cal control through propaganda and advertising.
             The emergence of mass communication from the depths of
           fifteenth-century Europe was a slow and deliberate process – after



                                         17
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34