Page 127 - New Trends in Eco efficient and Recycled Concrete
P. 127

Waste rubber aggregates                                           101

           4.4.2.5 Replacement of natural aggregates with crumb rubber in
                    concrete (up to 50%)
               ¸
           Topcu (1995) reported about the performance of concrete with rubber from used
           tyres (size 0 1 and 1 4 mm), at up to 45%, by volume. No substantial changes
           were observed after 7 and 28 days of curing up to 15% replacement ratio, while the
           compressive strength decreased for a larger rubber ratio substitution.
              Valadares et al. (2012) replaced natural sand in concrete with shredded rubber
           (0 4 mm) at up to 35.77%, by volume. Compressive strength, splitting tensile
           strength and modulus of elasticity were reduced by the addition of rubber sand.
           This reduction increased by increasing rubber sand content. After 28 days of curing
           compressive strength was reduced by 19%, 35% and 52% with the addition of
           12.5%, 24.15% and 35.77% of rubber sand, respectively, while the splitting tensile
           strength reduction was about 23%, 38% and 44%, respectively. The modulus of
           elasticity decreased by 15%, 28% and 38% with the addition of 12.5%, 24.15% and
           35.77% of rubber sand, respectively.
              Mohammed et al. (2012) found a reduction in the compressive and splitting ten-
           sile strength of hollow concrete blocks where natural sand was partially replaced
           with rubber sand (0 0.6 mm) at 10%, 25% and 50%, by volume. This reduction
           increased as the rubber content increases.
              Ling (2012) reported a reduction in the compressive strength of concrete blocks
           by replacing natural sand (0 4 mm) with rubber (1 5 mm) at up to 50%, by vol-
           ume. W/b ratios varied between 0.45 and 0.55. Reduction increased by increasing
           rubber sand content. After 28 days of curing, considering the concrete with w/c
           equal to 0.45, compressive strength reduction was about 2%, 19%, 24%, 33%, 35%,
           48%, 66% and 69% with the addition of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40% and
           50% of rubber sand, respectively.


           4.4.2.6 Replacement of natural aggregates with crumb rubber in
                    concrete (up to 100%)

           Turgut and Yesilata (2008) found a reduction in the mechanical properties of con-
           crete blocks where natural sand was replaced with crumb rubber (0.075 4.75 mm)
           at different contents, by volume. The compressive strength reduction was about
           12%, 33%, 57%, 69%, 81% and 84% with the addition of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%,
           50%, 60% and 70% of rubber sand, respectively, while the splitting strength reduc-
           tion was 15%, 34%, 42 %, 53%, 70%, 85% and 86%, respectively.
              El-Gammal et al. (2010) reported a reduction in the compressive strength and
           elastic modulus of concrete by replacing natural sand and coarse aggregate with
           crumb rubber (size 0.2 5 mm) at up to 100%, by weight. The compressive strength
           reduction was about 80% and 81% with the addition of 50% and 100% of rubber
           sand, respectively.
              Issa and Salem (2013) realised concrete mixes by replacing natural sand and
           crushed sand with crumb rubber (size 0.075 2.54 mm) at up to 100%, by volume.
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132