Page 169 - Nightmare Japan Contemporary Japanese Horror Cinema
P. 169

156                                           Nightmare Japan

                              narratological  ‘comfort  zone’,  safely  predicting  what  image  will  follow
                              the  one  presently  on  screen.  This  is  not  to  suggest  that  Higuchinsky
                              avoids  the  familiar  logics  of  classical  continuity  editing  altogether.
                              Indeed,  were  it  not  for  his  periodic  observance  of  such  ‘standardised’
                              editing  practices,  his  multiple  violations  of  audience  expectation  would
                              be nowhere near as disorienting as they are. Consequently, viewers would
                              not  experience  the  ontological  dislocation  necessary  to  fully  associate
                              with  the  characters’  mystification  at  the  supernatural  proliferation  of
                              spiral patterns.
                                     Furthermore,  as  the  film’s  action  unfolds,  the  narrative
                              continually  cycles back  to several  key  images,  often  re-visualising  them
                              in  ways  that  condition  our  previous  understanding  of  the  scenes  in
                              question.  As  mentioned  above,  Higuchinsky  revisits  Shuichi’s  father’s
                              suicide several times throughout the film. The first time we encounter his
                              death,  we  do  not  see  what  his  body  looks  like  within  the  washing
                              machine’s  tight  confines.  Later,  when  Tamura,  the  police  investigator,
                              visits  Shuichi  and  Kirie,  Higuchinsky  ‘shows  us’  Shuichi’s  father’s
                              suicide  from  the  perspective  of  a  videotape  recording  made  during  the
                              fatal  incident.  Here  again  Higuchinsky  carefully  elides  a  complete  or
                              stable visual disclosure of the tragic event, focusing the viewer’s attention
                              instead upon a mirror Shuichi’s father places in the washing machine, and
                              then cutting to a shot of the investigator’s, Shuichi’s and Kirie’s reaction
                              to  the  exaggerated  cracking  sounds  one  can  only  assume  is  Shuichi’s
                              father’s  bones  snapping  as  his  body  contorts.  Tamura  returns  to  this
                              videotape  later  in  the  film,  rewinding  and  fast-forwarding  to  moments
                              that  Higuchinsky  once  again  prevents  the  film’s  viewers  from  seeing.
                              Thus,  instead  of  witnessing  the  bizarre  suicide,  spectators  must  either
                              experience it via Tamura’s grimaces, or  endeavor to  ‘make sense’ of the
                              event  through  extreme  close-ups  of  the  video  footage  that  disallow
                              viewers  the  necessary  context  a  more  removed  perspective  would
                              provide.  Finally,  towards  the  film’s  conclusion,  Higuchinsky  again
                              returns  to  Shuichi’s  father’s  suicide,  this  time  from  a  perspective
                              seemingly  aligned  with  Kirie’s  gaze.  In  a  POV  tracking  shot  granted
                              ‘realistic’  immediacy  through  hand-held  cinematography,  spectators  are
                              finally  granted  a  glimpse  of  Shuichi’s  father’s  body  wound  snake-like
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174