Page 37 - Nightmare Japan Contemporary Japanese Horror Cinema
P. 37

24                                            Nightmare Japan

                              wider  array  of  horror  fans  and  paracinemaphiles 5  hungry  for  films  that
                              push  the  portrayal  of  violence  and  gore  to  new  extremes.  Merging  the
                              aesthetics  of  cinéma  vérité  and  cinema  vomitif,  they  are  ‘total  theater’
                              (Brottman 1997: 3) impacting viewers on the most visceral level through
                              a  consistent  barrage  of  graphic  scenes  of  physical  and  psychological
                              abuse  framed  by  little  more  than  scrolling  title  cards.  Such  a  cinematic
                              presentation at once gestures towards alienating the viewer (in an almost
                              Brechtian  sense)  from  the  graphic  content  to  follow,  and  threatens  to
                              collapse  the psychic distance between  spectator and spectacle. Presented
                              in a visual style that mimics the ‘look’ and ‘feel’ of ‘nonfiction films’ that
                              purport to document what André Bazin calls the ‘raw reality’ of everyday
                              life,  these  ‘topographical  narratives  of  the  human  body  split  open,
                              infested, rendered asunder, penetrated, truncated, cleft, sliced, suspended,
                              and  devoured’  (14)  arise  from  a  myriad  of  diverse  Japanese  cinematic
                              traditions,  ranging  from  pinku  eiga  (the  “pink”  or  soft-core  film)  to
                              chanbara  eiga  (the  samurai  film).  In  addition,  the  scenes  of  ritualised
                              brutality that define these texts provide a barometer of sorts for a plethora
                              of  social  concerns.  The  evisceration  of  the  female  body  in  Flowers  of
                              Flesh and Blood, for instance, is reminiscent of rituals like hara kira, ‘an
                              ancient act in which female votives  would offer up the  “flower” of their
                              entrails and blood by a self-inflicted knife wound’ (Hunter 1998: 159-60),
                              while the apportioning of gender roles within both films address concerns
                              about  the  stability  of  traditional  sex  and,  by  extension,  gender-based
                              divisions  of  labor  at  the  height  of  Japan’s  late  capitalist  ‘bubble
                              economy’.
                                     Given their substantial focus on the body as a site of trauma and
                              radical  reconfiguration,  the  Guinea  Pig  films’  position  within  Japanese
                              cinema  seems  appropriate  for  the  period  of  economic  prosperity,  rapid
                              technologisation, and extreme cultural transformation that began with the

                               5
                                ‘Paracinema’ is Jeffrey Sconce’s term for a set of reading practices clustered around a variety
                               of film texts that lend themselves to ironic and/or counter-hegemonic reading protocols in the
                               hands of viewers who focus their sophisticated reading skills on texts ignored by ‘legitimate’
                               taste  cultures.  In other words, paracinema is ‘less a distinct  group of  films than a particular
                               reading  protocol,  a  counter-aesthetic  turned  subcultural  sensibility  devoted  to  all  manner  of
                               cultural  detritus…[T]he  explicit  manifesto  of  paracinema  culture  is  to  valorise  all  forms  of
                               cinematic “trash”, whether such films have been either explicitly rejected or simply ignored by
                               legitimate film culture’ (Sconce  372).
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42