Page 174 - On Not Speaking Chinese Living Between Asia and the West
P. 174

10


                          LOCAL/GLOBAL
                          NEGOTIATIONS

                  Doing cultural studies at the crossroads





        The spatial metaphor of the crossroads signals for me a heightened sense of paradox
        in the contemporary practice of cultural studies. Cultural studies is often described
        as a practice of the crossroads, practised at the crossroads of various discourses, the
        busy and vibrant ‘meeting point in between different centres, disciplines and
        intellectual movements’, as the brochure for the first Crossroads in Cultural Studies
        conference, held in Tampere, Finland, in 1996, put it. According to the organizers
        of this conference, ‘the vitality of cultural studies depends on a continuous traffic
        through this crossroads’. Indeed, the (self-)legitimacy of cultural studies – as an
        increasingly global, transdisciplinary intellectual practice – depends par excellence
        on an ethics (and a politics) of the encounter: on the claimed productivity of
        dialogue across disciplinary, geographical and cultural boundaries, on a committed
        desire to reach out to ‘the other’, and on a refusal to homogenize plurality and
        heterogeneity as a way to resist, subvert or evade hegemonic forms of power. All
        these avowedly ‘postmodern’ ideals have become virtual articles of faith in cultural
        studies today. All well and good, but what does all this mean in practice? What
        do we do once we arrive at the crossroads? How are the encounters we enter into
        at the crossroads supposed to inspire, enrich, or stimulate us? How, that is, can
        the myriad, different and distinct projects we are all engaged in in our own peculiar
        contexts be meaningfully articulated into a larger, transnational and transdisci-
        plinary, yet coherent intellectual formation? While preparing this chapter, these
        questions put me in a mood of serious doubt, even a serious crisis about what it
        means to be doing cultural studies in a global(izing) context. This is not necessarily
        a bad thing. After all, as Gayatri Spivak (1990: 139) once pointedly remarked,
        ‘crisis management is [just] another name for life’ – an observation of particular
        resonance within the stressful societies of advanced postmodern capitalism. But
        let me share with you what this sense of crisis is, and how I think we can try, not
        so much to overcome it, as I don’t think it is possible to overcome it, but to live
        with it.
          The importance of an ethics of the encounter is reflected in the current popularity
        within cultural studies of a notion closely related to that of the crossroads, that
        of the borderlands, aptly described by Henry Giroux (1992: 209) as a space
        ‘crisscrossed with a variety of languages, experiences, and voices’. For Giroux, such

                                       163
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179