Page 404 - Petroleum Geology
P. 404

369

            trichtian.  The minimum hiatus near highs seems to be late Albian-Aptian  to
            early  Coniacian (Williams et al.,  1975, p.  372, fig. 9). That faults were still
            moving at this time is shown in Piper, where Coniacian and Santonian mark ac-
            cumulated on the downthrown side of  a southern fault, but not everywhere
            on the upthrown side (as discussed in Chapter 13, pp. 279-302).  This is evi-
            dence  that  here,  for  about  5 m.y.,  the  upthrown  block was not subsiding
            relative to base-level, but that the downthrown block subsided about 100 m
            (i.e.,  about  50,000  yrs/m!).  So fine was the balance here that it is hard  to
            escape the conclusion that accumulation  was continuous in places (with all
            the reservations discussed in Chapter 1 and in Chapter 13, pp. 295-196).
              By  the end  of  the  Cretaceous,  beginning of  the Tertiary, the North  Sea
            basin accumulated  sediment by virtue of  subsidence without faulting. Exten-
            sive and thick mudstones with some sands accumulated, the thicker sequences
            in  areas of  greatest subsidence. At least some of  the sands were to become
            petroleum reservoirs.
              The present relief  on the Jurassic-Cretaceous  disconformities and uncon-
            formities, generally reported to be about 2000 m,  has largely been induced
            by later events. Although some relief certainly existed on the erosion surfaces
            at the time, as shown by truncated strata on the present highs, it is unlikely to
            have been great. The general tendency towards greater thicknesses and more
            complete sequences in the lows is the result of a tendency to reduce relief by
            sediment accumulation.
              The  consistency  of  structure  and  stratigraphy  in  such  widely  separated
            areas as the North Sea and Australia, Arctic North America and South Africa,
            indicates,  as Kent  (1977)  so  clearly  expounded,  a world-wide sequence of
            events that  is  not  to  be  explained  simply  by  eustatic changes of  sea level.
            Doubtless  the broad  crustal events changed the volume of  the ocean  basins
            so that there were concomitant eustatic sea-level changes, and there is evidence
            of this in the stratigraphy; but these were a consequence of more fundamental
            geological events that took place from late Palaeozoic times to the present in
            large areas around the world. The significant events seem to be the inception
            and cessation  of  normal faulting, because this is a more local phenomenon.
            Some of  the periods of  non-accumulation and erosion may have been due to
            eustatic sea-level changes caused by  other events in the series in other parts
            of  the world.
              In  general, continental  margins of  the “passive”  or “aseismic” type were
            completed during the final post-unconformity stage of epeirogenic subsidence
            without faulting; but  it is not a universal consequence of  the whole process
            that continental margins were formed. The Sirte basin in Libya, for example,
            is a rift basin that was completed with transgressive Cretaceous and Tertiary,
            as we have seen. It is not a continental margin (and its geology must be taken
            into account  in any hypotheses concerning northward relative movement of
            Africa against Europe). Nor was this great Mesozoic event necessarily the first
   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409