Page 49 - Petroleum Geology
P. 49

In the Federal  Republic  of  Germany there are some faults that appear to
            have begun as normal growth faults, to have their sense of movement reversed.
            There is evidence of thickening of rock units on the overthrust block.
              It is evident that growth faults have various expressions and appear in vari-
            ous geological contexts, but there are two main classes:
              (a) Those in sedimentary basins formed by rifting, which affect the trans-
            gressive and the regressive sequence that usually follows closely in time.These
            are  basement  faults  that  continued  to move  during the early stages of  the
            development of  the basin.
              (b) Those in the regressive sequence of  a major sedimentary cycle. These
            are not upward  extensions of  basement  faults, but faults confined to the re-
            gressive sequence that die out downwards and many also upwards.
              We  shall examine here the nature of growth structures as such, leaving dis-
            cussion of their geological contexts to later chapters.

            The nature of growth faults

              The quality  of  correlation across a growth fault varies from poor to excel-
            lent. This must be seen as a measure of the degree to which the movement of
            the fault affected the sediments and their accumulation. Where rock-unit cor-
            relation across a growth fault is good, the process was clearly one of transport
            of sediment over a subsiding sedimentary column, with greater potential for
            accumulation on the more rapidly subsiding downthrowing block. The con-
            tinuity of  lithologies implied in good  correlation suggests that the supply of
            sediment generally exceeded the capacity of  the area to accumulate it. This
            is a characteristic of  regressions. It is instructive to examine the nature of a
            growth fault in some detail.
              Clearly, the deposition of  sediment from suspension  in water cannot lead
            to the observed results by  itself because there is no reason  why the rate of
            deposition  from suspension should be different across a subsurface feature,
            or even a surface feature of modest relief.
              These difficulties are removed if  the sediment accumulates from the trac-
            tion load on the sea floor. The clue to this lies with Barrell’s concept of  base-
            level, discussed at some length in Chapter 1. Sedimentary particles are moved
            by  the water until they reach a position in which the energy is insufficient to
            move them further. There they accumulate. Some particles reach that posi-
            tion  near  a growth fault, but of  these, more reach it on the downthrowing
            side than on the upthrowing side because of the differing rates of subsidence
            relative to baselevel. Note that this applies to muds as well as sands because
            mudstones also show thickness contrasts across growth faults.
              The  accumulation  of  sediment on the upthrowing side of  a growth fault
            is also evidence that it too was subsiding relative to baselevel, so we are led
            to the conclusion that both blocks of  a growth fault were subsiding during
            fault  movement,  but  one  side  was subsiding faster than  the other, and the
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54