Page 313 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 313

306                      MANO DANIEL

              which seeks  to be  both ultimately  literary  and  ultimately  scientific.^^ James
              L.  Clifford,  in  his  admirable From Puzzles to  Portraits,  suggests  "a  series
              of  five  categories  for  biography"—"objective," "scholarly-historical," "artis-
              tic-scholarly,"  "narrative,"  and  finally  "subjective"—although  he  makes
              clear  that  his  preference  is  for  "artistic-scholarly,"^'  which  he  takes  to
              represent  the  happy  medium  between  historical  science  and  literary  art.
                The  classification  systems  advanced  above  emphasize  a  methodological
              median  that  biographies  ought  to  adopt.  Biographers  acknowledge  that
              there  is  an  irreducible  subjective  or  interpretive  element  both  in  the
              subject  matter  and  in  the  production  of  biographies.  This  recognition  of
              irreducible  subjectivity  has  manifested  itself  in  the  internecine  battle  to
              determine  whether  biography is  an  "art," or  "craft" or a  "science." Woolf,
              for  example,  advocates  a  melioristic  position  between  these  antipodean
              options  by  arguing  that  the  biographer  is  "a  craftsman,  not  an  artist;  and
              his  work  is  not  a  work  of  art,  but  something  betwixt  and  between."^
                This  interpretive  element  is  also  evident  in  the  production  of
              biographies  since  biographers  have  agendas  that  influence  their  choice
              and  decision  of  subject,  the  angle  that  they  adopt  and  the  conventional
              form  in  which  they  choose  to  depict  their  stories.  Such  productions  will
              also  involve  the  adoption  of  philosophical  assumptions  about  the  nature
              and viability  of  their  enterprise.  One  particularly  tantalizing  and  seductive
              temptation  is  to  adopt  what  Young-Bruehl  calls  the  "essentialist  assump-
              tion"—"the  temptation  to  try  to  capture  the  subject  as  the  subject  really
             was,  to  catch  the  subject  in  moment  of  truth,  to  reveal  what  was  hidden
             even  from  those  close  to  the  event,  even  from  the  subject  himself  or
              herself."^^  This  assumption  can  manifest  itself  in  a  number  of  different
              forms.  In  the  majority  of  academic  biographies,  the  attempt  is  to  discover
              the  key  theoretical  concern  or  the  object  of  the  subject's  intellectual  or
             spiritual  quest.  Once  located  and  an  account  advanced  to  explain  the
             adoption  of  this  pivotal  insight  or  central  principle,  the  biographer  then




                  ^*  Paul  Murray  Kendall,  The  Art  of  Biography  (New  York  and  London:
              Garland  Publishing,  1985),  126-127.
                  ^' James  L.  Clifford,  From Puzzles to  Portraits (Chapel  Hill:  The  University  of
             North  Carolina  Press,  1970),  83-89.
                  ^  Virginia  Woolf,  "The  Art  of  Biography,"  170.
                  ^1 Elisabeth  Young-Bruehl,  "The  Writing  of  Biography,"  in  Mind  and  Body
             Politic  (New  York:  Routledge,  1989),  125.  The  following  classification  of  the  forms
             of  biographies  and  parts  of  its  description  are  borrowed  from  this  essay.
   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318