Page 114 - Pipeline Pigging Technology
P. 114

A computerized inspection system


        Problems with the        manual system


        In  1985,  after  eight  years  of operation  of  the  Frigg  Gas  Transportation
      System, pipeline engineers had increasing difficulties  in accessing informa-
      tion and performing analyses on the available pipeline inspection  data.
        Some of the  reasons  behind  these  difficulties  -were as follows:

        (1) The volume of inspection  data collected  since the  commissioning of
      the  pipelines  was  huge  and  increasing  rapidly.  This  was  due  in  part  to
     improving techniques providing more data and additionally, as many inspec-
      tion contractors  became computerized, they were  able to supply a greater
     variety of reports, e.g. the  1986 campaign on Frigg lines produced 4 volumes
     of Acoustic Reports and  18 volumes of ROV Reports (a volume being a 4-in A4
     ring binder).

        (2)  The  format  and  contents  of  reports  were  not  conducive  to  post-
     analysis,  being  often  based  on  operational  considerations  such  as:  dive
     references,  direction  of survey,  etc.

        (3) ROV surveys, as already mentioned, are only carried out  on  specific
     areas. As a consequence, a lot of effort  is required  to compile  an  inspection
      "history", to cross reference results and derive  trends.

        Reasons     for considering computerization



        Primarily, it was considered that computerization would  overcome  most
     of the difficulties  mentioned, or at least reduce their impact, and at the same
     time provide  additional advantages.
        However,  bearing  in  mind  the  large  amount  of  data  and  the  critical
     timescales of the campaigns, apre-requisite of the system was to minimize the
     data input effort  by capturing data in computer  form, e.g. magnetic tapes or
     other types of interface for direct  loading to the database.  Indeed,  inputting
     data manually would  have certainly defeated the purpose of the computeri-
     zation, which was to reduce  the amount of work.
        This  meant  that  the  inspection  contractors  had  to  be  computerized
     themselves.  In  fact,  by  1985,  the  majority  of  them  were  already  using
     computers:
           Offshore  - automatically  to  capture  positioning and  inspection  data
              such as UTM co-ordinates, kilometre posts, CP potential and sea bed
              profile.


                                       95
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119