Page 341 - Pipeline Pigging Technology
P. 341

Pipeline  Pigging  Technology


        Deriving acceptable defect curves


        The equations necessary for deriving acceptable  corrosion  defect curves
      are given above (or the acceptance  levels in the ANSI/ASME Code[12] can be
      adopted).  The  selection  of  safety  factors  for  use  in  Eqn(l)  will  be  the
      responsibility of the pipeline operator, but the hydrotest safety factor has the
      advantage of being directly related to code and pre-service requirements. In
      some codes (particularly for oil pipelines) the hydrotest level is relatively low
      (e.g. IP6[12]), and it may be better to use a higher hydrotest level in deriving
      a safety margin, e.g.  100%  SMYS as used in the ANSI/ASME B31A Code [5], [ 12],
      to ensure a reasonable safety  factor.

        Deriving repeat inspection intervals


        The  acceptable  defect  curves  can  be  used  during  repeat  inspections.
     These  can  be  combined  with  corrosion  rate  data  to  predict  increases  in
     corrosion depth with time, Fig. I4(a). The curves, with safety factors included,
     can also be used to both predict when any downrating of operating pressure
     is  needed  or  when  it  would  be  necessary  to  re-inspect  the  line  to  avoid
     downrating, Fig.l4(b).




        CONCLUDING           REMARKS


        A defect  assessment  methodology for corroded pipelines,  based  on  the
      above sections, can be proposed. Fig. 15 summarizes the methodology, and it
      is recommended that this type of methodology  is applied  to  future  assess-
      ments of corroded pipelines. It can be applied to pipelines containing limited
     corrosion  or extensive  corrosion.  However, there are some  limitations, and
      these  are  listed  in  Ref.3.  For  example,  the  interaction  of  neighbouring
     corrosion  pits is not  well  understood.  However,  the  methodology  will  be
     applicable to most corrosion  types, despite  these limitations.
        It  should be  emphasized that a defect  assessment  is only as good  as  the
      defect inspection report. If the report is inaccurate, the defect assessment will
      be inaccurate. Therefore, a reliable, accurate inspection  tool is required if the
      above methodology is to be applied. These  tools can be expensive,  but they
      allow defect assessments which  avoid expensive  repairs to the  pipeline.




                                       322
   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346