Page 56 - Planning and Design of Airports
P. 56

34    Airp o r t  Pl anning


                 capital improvement funding support, in 1990, Congress passed the
                 Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act. This act established the
                 policy of allowing airports to impose a passenger facility charge (PFC)
                 to supplement their capital improvement programs, while allowing
                 greater amounts of AIP funding to be allocated to smaller airports
                 with capital improvement needs. Under this Act, an airport applied to
                 collect a $1, $2, or $3 charge, on any passenger enplaning at the air-
                 port. The fee would be collected by the air carriers, upon purchase of
                 a ticket. Revenues generated by PFCs would then be spent by the
                 airport that generated the revenue on allowable costs associated with
                 certain capital improvement projects approved by the FAA that
                 enhance safety, security, or capacity, or increase air carrier competi-
                 tion. In 2001, the maximum allowable PFC was raised to $4.50. As of
                 June 2007, approximately $58.6 billion in PFCs have been collected at
                 367 airports nationwide. More than 1500 projects utilizing PFC reve-
                 nues have been approved since the 1990 Aviation Safety and Capacity
                 Expansion Act introduced the PFC program.

                 AIR-21: The Wendell Ford Aviation Investment Act
                 for the 21st Century
                 In April 2000, funding for airport planning and design through the
                 AIP and PFC programs was increased with the Wendell H. Ford Avia-
                 tion Investment and Reform Act for the Twenty-FirstCentury, known
                 as AIR-21 (Public Law 106-181). This funding increase was designed
                 to assist larger airports which have become highly congested, as well
                 as smaller airports struggling to preserve commercial air service.
                    The AIR-21 Act was introduced at a time when the nation’s air
                 carriers were coming off record profits and growth in air transporta-
                 tion was at its highest in history. As part of the act, AIP funding was
                 increased, on the order of 300 percent to many airports to allow for
                 capital improvement projects designed to relieve the increased con-
                 gestion and delays encountered at the nation’s largest airports at the
                 end of the 1990s.

                 The Aviation and Transportation Security Act of 2001
                 In response to the terrorist attacks involving the hijacking of four U.S.
                 airliners used in suicide attack missions on Washington, D.C. and
                 New York City, on September 11, 2001, The Aviation and Transporta-
                 tion Security Act (Public Law 107-071) was signed into law. This Act
                 created the Transportation Security  Administration (TSA), which
                 took authority over aviation security and imposed a series of require-
                 ments for screening air carrier passengers and luggage including
                 mandatory electronic inspection of all checked luggage. This has had
                 profound effects on airport terminal planning and design. To fund
                 these policies, the Act authorized a passenger surcharge of $2.50 per
                 flight segment and a fee imposed to air carriers equivalent to each
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61