Page 72 - Polymer-based Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications
P. 72

Preparation and properties of nanopolymer advanced composites: A review  49


            Table 2.8 Damage parameters for samples impacted at 30
            and 45 J [39]

                       Left      Right                 Base
            Type of    angle     angle      Top width  width (b)   Indentation
            core       (θ 2 )    (θ 2 )     (a)mm      mm          depth (h)mm
            Impact energy 30 J 1% face sheet sandwich

            Neat       34        36         11.3       40.69       No dent
            0.5% clay  36        38         9.1        30.20       6.32
            1% clay    40.5      38         9.5        20.48       4.04
            2% face sheet sandwich
            Neat       31        26         9.9        21.52       3.98
            0.5% clay  31        20         9.9        20.06       5.42
            1% clay    45        40         8.9        15.39       3.61
            Impact energy 45 J 1% face sheet sandwich

            Neat       38        29         11.64      35.22       3.52
            0.5% clay  45        35         11.54      31.75       4.04
            1% clay    37        44         11.66      27.47       4.35
            2% face sheet sandwich
            Neat       32        26         13.37      49.49       No dent
            0.5% clay  43        41         11.56      25.39       3.74
            1% clay    36        45         10.44      27.53       5.50





              ´
              Avila et al. [43] have investigated the influence of exfoliated nanostructures on
           sandwich composites that are made of fiberglass/nanomodified epoxy face sheets with
           polystyrene foams core under impact loadings. The results show that the addition of
           5 wt% of nanoclay leads to a more efficient energy absorption. The failure modes also
           seem to be affected by the nanoclay addition to the face sheets. Also, they have pro-
           posed a model to predict the peak reaction during the low-velocity impact is proposed
           based on the pulse duration. The model predictions are limited as the core yielding is
           not taken into consideration. The addition of nanoclay gives the impression of having
           effect on pulse duration, as they increase the face sheet laminate stiffness and conse-
           quently it increases the panel overall bending rigidity. Further, the predicted values
           were compared with the experimental data (Fig. 2.21) and found good agreement.
           However, for large energies (> 50 J), a small deviation was observed. This can be
           due to the intense core crushing under the impact area. It is noticed that for the largest
           energy 75 J, there is a difference of 6% between the predicted value and the experi-
           mental data is noticed.
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77