Page 115 - Practical Ship Design
P. 115

82                                                             Chapter 4

                The  following  items  of  steelwork  which  are  more  usually  bought  from  a
              subcontractor are generally included in the outfit weight and for consistency this
              should remain so even if  for a particular  ship they have been fabricated by the
              shipyard itself
                - sternframe, rudder, rudderstock, shaft brackets and similar structures whether
                   these are castings or fabrications;
                - steel hatch covers for cargo hatches (covers for access hatches are, however,
                   usually in the structural weight);
                - bollards and fairleads.
                Within the outfit weight, two other items which can cause demarcation diffi-
              culties are plumberwork and electrical work -systems  which are partly in and
              partly out of the engine room. The demarcation here usually divides the systems at
              the engine room bulkheads or engine casings. Everything outside the engine room
              is taken as hull outfit and everything within as machinery weight, with the same
              demarcation generally applied when writing the specifications of these systems.
                There are a number of other items part of which is often fitted within the engine
              room which for simplicity are usually dealt with wholly as hull items: refrigerating
              machinery whether for cargo, stores or HVAC; sewage systems; watertight doors;
              casing insulation and paint.



                           4.2 STRUCTURAL WEIGHT APPROXIMATIONS

              4.2. I  Lloyd’s equipment number method

              In the author’s 1962 paper, the use of Lloyd’s equipment numeral was advocated
              as a basis for estimating steel-weight in preference to the numerals L x B x D or
              L(B + D) which were in common use at that time.
                The reasons given for this were that the equipment number introduced allow-
              ances of approximately the correct order for changes in draft and in the extent of
              erections, and avoided making the choice of the deck to which D was measured as
              critical as it is with both the other numerals.
                The  Lloyd’s  equipment  numeral  (E) of  1962 is  no  longer  in  use  for  the
              determination of ship’s anchors and cables, hawsers and warps; it was replaced in
              1965 by a new numeral, which is now common to all classification societies having
              been agreed to be a more rational measure of the wind, wave and current forces
              which  act  on a vessel  at anchor.  The new  numeral,  however good it is  for its
              primary purpose, is not a suitable parameter against which to plot steel-weights,
              but the reasons given for the  use  of  the old numeral  still  stand. For those not
              familiar with the old E number, the formula for this is as follows:
                E 1 L(B + 7‘) + 0.85 L(D - 7‘) + 0.85( (E,  . h,) + 0.75{ (E,  . h2)   (4.1)
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120