Page 271 - Practical Ship Design
P. 271

Powering II                                                          229


           The parts of the line between  Cb = 0.55 and 0.65 and above cb = 0.80 take the
        form that might be expected but the “hump” between cb = 0.70 and 0.80 is not so
        readily understandable.  One possible explanation may be that less attention has
        been paid to the development of models in this region.


        7.9.2 Length
        Length affects powering in several ways, the most important being the effect it
        exercises on Froude number, the significance of which is clearly shown in the C,
        figures presented in $7.2 with increasing length reducing F, for any required speed
        and thereby reducing C,.
           For a required displacement the effect does not end there since an increase in
        length as well as reducing the Froude number will also result in a reduction in the
        other dimensions of B, T and C,,  and reductions in the first and last of these will
        also reduce the resistance.
           A third effect, or possibly another way of looking at the same thing, dealt with in
        96.2, is the reduction in the frictional resistance coefficient with length.
           At  high  Froude  numbers,  a  long  slender  ship  shows  to  advantage, but  the
        smaller wetted surface of a short, beamy, deep ship can be advantageous at lower
        Froude numbers where frictional resistance predominates.
           The reduction in EHP obtainable by increasing length is offset to a small extent
        by the reduction in propulsive efficiency which is caused by an increase in length.


        7.9.3 The effect of  UV’”
        Another way of looking at the effect of length is provided by assessing the effect
        that LIV“’  has on the resistance.
           In  $6.8 it  was  noted  that  plots  of  resistance  against  LIV“’  were  used  by
        Guldhammer and Harvald in association with a standard BIT.
           A feel for  values is not easy to acquire, but if the values of the ratios LIB, BID
        and TID suggested in 93.3 are used,  it is instructive to see the values of L/V”’
        which result.
           For a fast (F, = 0.30) long slender fine lined ship with a B freeboard having Cb =
        0.55, LIB = 7.5, BID = 1.65, and TID = 0.69, the value of L1V”3 is 6.24.
           For a slow (F, = 0.14) short beamy full ship with an A or B-60 freeboard having
        C,, = 0.85, LIB = 5.5, BID = 1.9, and TID = 0.77, the value of L/V’I3 is 4.44.
           Diagrams in a 1966 RINA paper “The BSRA Methodical Series” by Lackenby
        and Parker indicate that there is no benefit in increasing L/V“3 above about 5.2 for
        ships with block coefficients of 0.75 or more.
           For C,  values between 0.75 and 0.60 the value should increase from 5.2 to 5.6.
           For Cb values of less than 0.60 the value should increase to about 6.0.
   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276