Page 247 - Practical Well Planning and Drilling Manual
P. 247

Section 2 revised 11/00/bc  1/17/01  12:04 PM  Page 223








                                                                                  2.5.5
                                                            Drilling Fluids Program  [      ]



                       PHPA or PAC should be avoided, since they are not compatible with
                       any divalent cations that will be present in the salt. Viscosity should be
                       obtained from the use of a biopolymer such as xanthan or wellan gum.
                       Some forms of starch can also provide viscosity. Starch can be used to
                       provide filtration control as long as the bottom hole temperature is not
                       much above 200˚F. At higher temperatures, starch would require to be
                       stabilized or a variant of starch that is more temperature stable should
                       be used. At temperatures above 250˚F the usage of CMHEC (carboxy
                       methyl hydroxy ethyl cellulose) or other temperature stable polymers
                       should be considered.
                           There is little point in running a pH in the system much above a
                       neutral pH unless any deflocculants or any other material used in the
                       system requires a higher pH. Increasing pH results in increased insolu-
                       bility for most salts. Any salts that come into solution from the forma-
                       tion are best kept in solution. For corrosion control, the use of a film
                       forming amine may be considered.
                           Seawater polymer mud. If shale is not particularly reactive, it may
                       be adequately drilled with a seawater polymer system. All the princi-
                       ples of an encapsulating polymer fluid as previously described in this
                       section will hold true except that no additional inhibitive chemical
                       such as potassium chloride would be added to the system. Inhibition
                       would be obtained from the encapsulating polymers and the chemistry
                       of the seawater.
                           Using a seawater polymer system will provide for all the advan-
                       tages of a nondispersed mud, e.g., the rheology and ability to control
                       low-gravity solids.
                           It will be the case that for a seawater nondispersed polymer system,
                       there will be more inhibition if it is made up on PAC and not on PHPA.
                       The reasoning behind this is as follows:
                           In a potassium chloride polymer mud, PHPA is the best available
                       polymer because of its encapsulating ability but it has to be protected
                       or otherwise it will break down. The hardness has to be controlled at
                       below 200 or 300 ppm depending on the pH and the pH must be kept
                       low and definitely a maximum of 10. However, the potassium ion is
                       providing substantial inhibition. In using a seawater polymer system as
                       opposed to KCL PHPA mud, the chemical inhibition from the potassi-
                       um ion will not be present. Second, any inhibitive effect from calcium
                       that comes from the seawater will not be present because the calcium


                                                     223
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252