Page 310 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 310

ii'

 286   PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION   EXTENSIONS OF THE PSA CONCEPT      287
 -----   small  scales,  at  which  heat  dissmat1on  1s  rapid  relative  to  the  rate  of heat
 100.0   -----------  crnlization. The "molecular gate" can  operate  isothermally only at  relatively
         generatmn  by  adsorotion.  ln  order  to  operate  a  Iarge-scaie  version  of this
          orocess.  it would be necessary  to  mtroduce  heat  exChanged  at  both  ends of
          the adsorbent bed, thus effectively converting the rnoiccular gate to a TCPSA
 80.0
         unit.
 0          The orospects for commercialization of the TCPSA process are difficuit to
          assess.  The mdicatwns are  that  m  terms of energy efficiency  and  adsorbent
          productivity the TCPSA  process  is,  for  many applications, significantly more
 60.0     economic  than  a  traditional  PSA  orocess.  The  prospects  for  developing  an
 I  o  =ta1   1morovect  adsorbent  contactor  appear  orom1smg,  and  this  would  further
 j -  ll..E + axial disr,cmon   enhance the competitive position of TCPSA. The issue of capital cost 1s more
 -- LDF + axial dispemoo   difficult to assess, since no large TCPSA umt has yet been built.  However, 1t
 40.0   - - ' ILE {no dispers100)   I   seems  Iikely  that  the remainmg economic  barriers  to  the commercialization

 --· l.DF(nodispemoo)   of TCPSA  system  will  be  overcome  eventually,  and· a  raoid  spread  of this
          technology  to  a  range  of  commercially  important  :separations  may  occur
          within  a few years.
 · 1:.1-.__,_ __ 2...loo-__,_ __ 4....1.oo _  __._ __ 6_._oo _  _._ _  __.soo
 20 0       The single  column  RPSA system  is,  m  ormcioie,  ooerable  at  large  scale.
 0  I     However,  as  the  scale  of the  process  mcreases,  the  issue  of pressure  drop
 parocle stze (microns)   (and  therefore  power  consumot1on)  becomes  mcreasmgly  important.  As  a
 ·I       result  of the high-pressure  drop,  the  power  consumption  m a  RPSA  system
 Figure  7.15  Effect  of particic  size  on  purity  of the  oxygen  product  from  a  RPSA   I   will  always  be  higher  than  that  of  a  well-designed  two-column  process
 process showing comoanson of experimental results with  the profiles calculated from   I   operated under comoarable conditions. The economic viability of this type  of
 13
          process 1s  therefore limited  to small-scale applications.
 vanous theoretical  ffiodeis.  (From Al pay et ai. 1  with  permission.)
            Of the  three  systems  described  in  this  chapter oti.ly  the  TCPSA  process
          appears  to  offer  reasonable  orospects  for  large-scale  ooerat10ns.  However,
 product.  However,  shorter  feed  time  leads  to  mcreased  oxygen  recovery.   the economic operation of such a process at high throughputs cteoends on the
 Energy  consumotion  will  therefore  depend  on  the  desired  product  ounty.   develooment  of a  new  and  more  efficient  mass  transfer  device  to  avoid  the
 Recovery increases with both increasmg delay and exhaust time. The product   inherent limitations of a  packed  bed contactor.
 oxygen  concentration  shows  a  broad  optimum  with  increasing  delay  but
 decreases monotonically with decreasmg exhaust  time.
 Jn  a more recent study Aloay, Kenney, and Scott  13   investigated the effect
 of particle size on a  RPSA air separation umt using 5A zeolite.  The results
          References
 shown  in  Figure 7.15  show clearly the existence of an optimum  particle size
 for product:ennchment. A s1mulation including both pressure droo and mass
 tra~sfer  limitations  shows  that  the  product  enrichment  is  limited  for  small   1.  N.  H.  Sweed  and  R.  H.  Wilhelm,  Ind.  Eng.  Chem.  Fund.  8,  221  (1968).  See  also  N.  H.
             Sweed,  A!ChE Symp.  Ser. 80(233), 44  (1984).
 oart1cle  sizes  by  axial  dispersion  and  the  pressure  dynamics  of the  system,
 and  for  larger particles by intraparucte diffusional  resistance.   2.  R.  L.  Pigford, B.  Baker, and D. E.  Blum,  Ind.  Eng.  Chem.  Fund.,  8,848 (1969) .
          .,  G.  E.  Keller and C.H. A.  Kuo, U.S.  Patent 4,354,854 (1982),  to  Union  Carbide  Corp.
          4.  B.  G.  Keefer,  U.S.  Patents.  4,702,903,  4,816.121,  4,801,308,  4,968,329,  5,096,469,  and
 7.4  Future Prospects   5,082,473; Canadian Patent 1256088; European  Patent 0143537.
           5.  P.H. Turnock and  R.H. Kadlec,  A/Ch£ J.  17,335 (1971).
 None of the systems described in this chapter has yet  been developed beyond
 the  laboratory scale;  so  the  ouestion anses as  to  the prospects for  commer-  6.  D. E.  Kowler and  R.  H. Kadlec,  A/Ch£ J.  18,  1207 (I 972).
   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315