Page 178 - Privacy in a Cyber Age Policy and Practice
P. 178

166  PRIVACY IN A CYBER AGE

               Critics argue that the collection of abandoned DNA centers represents
                                                     58
           “the uncritical surrender of important civil liberties.”  Elizabeth Joh holds
           that police that use abandoned DNA bypass “criminal procedure rules that
           normally apply to searches and seizures” as well as restrictions on adding
           DNA profiles to CODIS, and she disputes the idea that California v. Green-
                                                   59
           wood, a ruling about garbage, justifies the practice.  And, collecting DNA
           in this way, critics, believe, violates the expectation of privacy of people
           who are often unaware that they leave their DNA behind. (This last con-
           cern would hold only as long as this police practice, often featured in TV
           shows, does not become more widely known). Despite the Greenwood rul-
           ing, the collection of abandoned DNA has not been unanimously accepted
           by judicial and legislative authorities. The Oregon Appeals Court excluded
                                                         60
           abandoned DNA evidence in State v. Galloway and Hoesly  (though with a
           property rather than privacy-based argument), and lower courts in a num-
           ber of states have established higher standards for state and local police on
           police use of abandoned property more generally. 61
              In response, one notes that if police were not be entitled to collect
           abandoned DNA (without a warrant), they would logically also have to
           be banned from collecting abandoned hair or finger prints, or examine
           trash, on the same grounds. Such limitations would greatly hamper the
           police’s work and greatly tilt the liberal communitarian balance away from
           public safety.



                                  4. Racial Profiling

           Forensic DNA usages have also been challenged on the grounds that
           they discriminate against people of color in the United States, especially
           Black and Latino men. Critics argue that at all stages of DNA usages—
           arrestee sample collection, convicted offender sample collection, database
           searches, and partial match searches—people of color are disproportion-
           ately affected. This is due to institutional racism in the American criminal
           justice system, which has many sources, including that the laws are harsher
           on street crime (more likely to be committed by minorities and those of
           low income) than white collar crime, despite the fact that the latter imposes
                               62
           greater economic harm;  harsher penalties for the use of crack cocaine
           (more often used by minorities) than for the use of cocaine (more often
           used by white people); biases build into the composition and attitudes of
           many local police forces as well as socio economic conditions that predis-
           pose some groups to commit more crimes that others.
              One aspect of racial profiling relates to the ways DNA samples are
           collected. In cases where police have a loose physical description of a crime
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183