Page 267 - Probability and Statistical Inference
P. 267

244    5. Concepts of Stochastic Convergence

                                    Proof For arbitrary but otherwise fixed ε (> 0), we apply the Markov
                                 inequality (Theorem 3.9.1) and write


                                                                     –r
                                 Thus, we have 0 ≤ P{| T  – a |≥ ε} ≤ ξ  ε  → 0 as n → ∞. That is, P{| T  –
                                                                  r,n
                                                      n
                                                                                               n
                                 a |≥ε} ≤ ξ  ε  → 0 as n → ∞. !
                                            –r
                                          r,n
                                             In Example 5.2.3, the Weak WLLN does not apply,
                                                       but Theorem 5.2.2 does.
                                    Example 5.2.3 Let X , ..., X  be identically distributed with –∞ < µ < ∞, 0
                                                           n
                                                      1
                                 < σ < ∞, but instead of assuming independence among these X’s, we only
                                 assume that Cov(X , X ) = 0, for i ≠ j = 1, ..., n, n ≥ 1. Again, we have V(  )
                                                    j
                                                 i
                                 = n  σ  which converges to zero as n → ∞.  Thus, by the Theorem 5.2.2,
                                       2
                                    –1
                                                 as n → ∞. !
                                      Example 5.2.3 shows that the conclusion from the Weak WLLN
                                       holds under less restrictive assumption of uncorrelation among
                                          the X’s rather than the independence among those X’s.
                                    Example 5.2.4 Here we directly apply the Theorem 5.2.2. Let X , ..., X
                                                                                           1
                                 be iid Uniform(0, θ) with θ > 0. From Example 4.2.7, recall that T  = X , the n
                                                                                        n
                                                                                            n:n
                                 largest order statistic, has the pdf given by
                                 Thus,                                            , and similarly we
                                 get                   . That is, E{(T  – θ) } = 2(n + 1)  (n + 2)  θ 2
                                                                                     –1
                                                                                              –1
                                                                          2
                                                                    n
                                 which converges to zero as n → ∞. Now, we apply the Theorem 5.2.2 with
                                 a = θ and r = 2 to conclude that     as n → ∞. !
                                    We can, however, come to the same conclusion without referring to the
                                 Theorem 5.2.2. Look at the next example.
                                    Example 5.2.5 (Example 5.2.4 Continued) Let X , ..., X  be iid uniform on
                                                                             1
                                                                                  n
                                 the interval (0, θ) with θ > 0. Let us directly apply the Definition 5.2.1 to
                                 show that T =         as n → ∞. Recall the pdf of T  from (5.2.3). Now,
                                           n
                                                                                n
                                 for arbitrary but otherwise fixed ε > 0, one has


                                 where p  is positive. We simply need to evaluate the lim p  as n → ∞.
                                        n                                              n
                                 Now, with 0 < ε < θ, we have
   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272