Page 623 - Probability and Statistical Inference
P. 623

600    14. Appendix

                                 and later he took to mathematics. During early upbringing in a private school,
                                 he developed extraordinary skills in geometrical ideas. His uncanny depth in
                                 geometry first became vivid in his derivation [Fisher (1915)] of the distribu-
                                 tion of the sample correlation coefficient.
                                    Fisher went to Cambridge in 1909 to study mathematics and physics where
                                 he came across K. Pearson’s (1903) paper on the theory of evolution. He was
                                 very influenced by this paper and throughout his life, Fisher remained deeply
                                 committed to both genetics and evolution. Fisher was regarded as a first-rate
                                 geneticist of his time. He received B.A. from Cambridge in 1912, having passed
                                 the Mathematical Tripos Part II as a Wrangler. On the outbreak of war, Fisher
                                 volunteered for the military services in August, 1914, but he was disappointed
                                 by his rejection on account of poor eye sight.
                                    Fisher received both M.A. (1920) and Sc.D. (1926) degrees from Cam-
                                 bridge. During 1919-1933, he was a statistician in the Rothamsted Experi-
                                 mental Station, Harpenden. During 1933-1943, he was the Galton Professor
                                 of Eugenics in the University College, London. In the University College, he
                                 became the Editor of Annals of Eugenics and during 1943-1957, he was the
                                 Arthur Balfour Professor of Genetics in Cambridge. During 1959-1962, Fisher
                                 lived in South Australia as a Research Fellow at the CSIRO Division of Math-
                                 ematical Statistics, University of Adelaide.
                                    The fundamental concepts of likelihood, sufficiency, ancillarity, condition-
                                 ality, maximum likelihood estimation, consistency, and efficiency were fully
                                 developed by Fisher from ground zero. He had built a logical theory of scien-
                                 tific inference based on the information gathered from data. In the areas of
                                 correlations, partial correlations, directional data, multivariate analysis, dis-
                                 criminant analysis, factor analysis, principal components, design of experi-
                                 ments, modeling, anthropology, genetics, for example, Fisher gave the foun-
                                 dations. Anderson (1996) reviewed Fisher’s fundamental contributions in the
                                 area of multivariate analysis. Efron (1998) explained Fisher’s influence and
                                 legacy in the twenty first century.
                                    Fisher (1930) developed the notion of fiducial probability distributions for
                                 unknown parameters which were supposedly generated by inverting the dis-
                                 tribution of appropriate pivotal random variables. He was very fond of fiducial
                                 probability and applied this concept vigorously whenever he had an opportu-
                                 nity to do so, for example in Fisher (1935,1939). The articles of Buehler
                                 (1980), Lane (1980) and Wallace (1980) provide important perspectives of
                                 fiducial inference.
                                    Fisher was an ardent frequentist. On many occasions, he fought tooth
                                 and nail to defend against any hint or allegation from the Bayesians that
                                 somewhere he tacitly used the Bayes’s Theorem without mentioning it.
   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628