Page 152 - Psychological Management of Individual Performance
P. 152

134                          appraisal: an individual psychological perspective
                               McEvoy, G. M., & Buller, P. F. (1987). User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting.
                                 Personnel Psychology, 40, 785–797.
                               McCune, J. C. (1997). Employee appraisals the electronic way. Management Review, 86, 44–46.
                               McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
                               McGregor, D. (1957). An uneasy look at performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 35,
                                 89–94.
                               Meyer, H. H., Kay, E., & French, J. R. P. (1965). Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard
                                 Business Review, 43, 123–129.
                               Napier, N. K., & Latham, G. P. (1986). Outcome expectancies of people who conduct performance
                                 appraisals. Personnel Psychology, 39, 827–837.
                               Nathan, B. R., Morhman, A. M., Jr., & Milliman, J. (1991). Interpersonal relations as a context
                                 for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: A longitudinal study.
                                 Academy of Management Journal, 34, 352–369.
                               Nemeroff, W. F., & Wexley, K. N. (1979). An exploration of the relationships between perfor-
                                 mance feedback interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by managers
                                 and subordinates. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 25–34.
                               Newton, T., & Findlay, P. (1996). Playing God? The performance of appraisal. Human Resource
                                 Management Journal, 6, 42–58.
                               Nydegger, R. V. (1975). Developmental changes in abstractness and moral reasoning. Dissertation
                                 Abstracts International, 32, 4109A. University Microfilms, No. 72-03, 831.
                               Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and
                                 locus of control in the self efficacy and goal setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology,
                                 82, 792–802.
                               Pilon, L. J. (1993). Quoted in “Jobs, Jobs”, Business Week, 22 February, page 74.
                               Pollack, D. M., & Pollack, L. J. (1996). Using 360 degree feedback in performance appraisal.
                                 Public Personnel Management, 25, 507–528.
                               Prieto, J. M., & Simon, C. (1997). Network and its implications for assessment. In N. Anderson &
                                 P. Herriot (Eds.), International Handbook of Selection and Assessment. Chichester: Wiley &
                                 Sons.
                               Robertson, I. T., & Sadri, G. (1993). Managerial self-efficacy and managerial performance.
                                 British Journal of Management, 4, 37–45.
                               Rothaus, P., Morton, R. B., & Hanson, P. G. (1965). Performance appraisal and psychological
                                 distance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 48–54.
                               Roush, P. E., & Atwater, L. (1992). Using the MBTI to understand transformational leadership
                                 and self-perception accuracy. Military Psychology, 4, 1, 17–34.
                               Sagie, A., Elizur, D., & Yamauchi, A. (1996). The structure and strength of achievement
                                 motivation: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 17, 431–444.
                               Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and
                                 Personality, 9, 185–211.
                               Shrauger, J. S. (1975). Responses to evaluations as a function of initial self-perceptions.
                                 Psychological Bulletin, 82, 581–596.
                               Silverman, S. B., & Wexley, K. N. (1984). Reaction of emlpoyees to performance appraisal inter-
                                 views as a function of their participation in rating scale development. Personnel Psychology,
                                 37, 703–710.
                               Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement:
                                 Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154.
                               Spector, P. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control.
                                 Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482–497.
                               Stanton, J. M. (2000). Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review and
                                 research directions. Human Performance, 13, 85–113.
                               Stoffey, R. W., & Reilly, R. R. (1997). Training appraisees to participate in appraisal: Effects on
                                 appraisers and appraisees. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 219–239.
                               Sulsky, L. M., & Keown, J. L. (1998). Performance appraisal in the changing world of work:
                                 Implications for the meaning and measurement of work performance. Canadian Psychology,
                                 39, 52–59.
                               Swann, W. B. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and
                                 Social Psychology, 53, 1038–1051.
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157