Page 12 - Religion in the Media Age Media, Religion & Culture
P. 12

Introduction















            Religion and the media seem to be ever more connected as we move
            further into the twenty-first century. It is through the media that much of
            contemporary religion and spirituality is known. Notable events and icons
            seem to emerge with increasing frequency. In recent years alone we’ve seen
            the mediated events of the September 11, 2001 and July 7, 2005 terror
            attacks, widely covered scandals in the US and European Catholic
            Churches, public struggles within religious groups over social values such
            as gay rights, US political campaigns dominated by mediated discourses of
            religion, the re-emergence of religion in European political and social life,
            Mel Gibson’s  The Passion of the Christ and William Arntz’s  What the
                              1
            Bleep Do We Know?, Tom Cruise joining John Travolta as entertainment
            industry icons of Scientology, Madonna playing the same role in relation
            to Kabbalah, an increasing number of popular television and film
            portrayals of gothic, horror, science fiction, magical, mysterious, and
            conventional religion and spirituality, and controversies over the very pres-
            ence of religion – of various kinds – in “the media.” The realms of
            “religion” and “media” can no longer be easily separated, and it is the
            purpose of this book to begin to chart the ways that media and religion
            intermingle and collide in the cultural experience of media audiences.
              It has been easy for us to think of relations between religion and the
            media in institutional terms. We have thought of religion as a set of tradi-
            tions, dogmas, practices, and institutions that exist in an autonomous
            position  vis-à-vis “the culture.” We have thought of culture as merely
            making communication, interaction, memory, and history possible within
            social relations by providing the languages and contexts of interaction. In
            this “received” view, society is the more fixed and hard set of categories
            within which human beings must learn to function. It provides the struc-
            tures and boundaries within which things like “culture” and “religion” do
            their work. And, individual identity is somehow a  result of these other
            factors, conditioned – even mostly determined – by them.
              This social-theoretical syllogism is being undermined by trends in
            contemporary social and political life, and by media evolution and change.
            Media and entertainment figures rival traditional social institutions and
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17