Page 176 - Religion in the Media Age Media, Religion & Culture
P. 176

Born-agains and mainstream believers  165

            program was “spiritual” for her, “because I think when you’re talking
            about higher powers and higher beings and that type of thing, that there’s
            an undercurrent of spiritualism in that.” The same goes for the X-Files,
            but in describing it Rachel goes beyond merely attributing religion-like
            qualities to the program, and struggles with her own attraction to some-
            thing about it that she resists and can’t quite define.

               Yeah, [X-Files] is like another kind of religion, basically. People can
               really get involved with . . . but I don’t look at it that way. “Well, the
               truth is out there.” Well, what truth? It’s a whole different branch...
               the hereafter, the here and now. It’s out there, I guess. I don’t know. It
               could be. I guess you could say it’s spiritual, or you could just say it’s
               science fiction. I don’t know. I don’t really watch the shows based on
               that.

            Like the others, then, the Alberts do not inscribe a bright line between reli-
            gious and secular media. In important ways, they live more on the
            “secular” media map than they live separately from it. They implicitly
            recognize that their role as parents is not to cordon their children off from
            the influence of profane secular-humanist culture, but to learn to negotiate
            with it. And, they find important symbolic, cultural, and even religious
            “capital” within it.
              The Alberts illustrate more clearly than the others something that all
            three families seem to have in common. The choices they make in the
            media sphere – the “accounts of media” through which they describe their
            relationship to media, the practices of media consumption they engage in
            and attempt to educate their children about, and the meanings they nego-
            tiate and derive from media content – all serve as important markers of
            their negotiations between the various worlds they inhabit. These
            contexts – their faith; religious symbols, claims, and traditions; the
            symbols, claims, and traditions of the broader culture; and the media – all
            insist on certain kinds of identifications, practices, and loyalties. Each has
            its own saliencies and its own dangers. Significantly, though, it can be seen
            that the media sphere is active in providing both pointers to the other
            contexts, and ways of navigating them, and is in some ways the “home
            base” from which this all takes place.
              We can see that much of what we expected to find among families that
            fit Roof’s “born-again” category was a bit off the mark. Each of the fami-
            lies we’ve seen here, as well as others in our sample and ones we met in
            previous chapters, endorses some of the most basic “accounts of media”
            shared by the culture at large. In terms of parenting, there is a consensual
            expectation that parenting involves a kind of “media education” for the
            children. Some media are good and some are bad. These born-again fami-
            lies agree that education and enlightenment are important values of the
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181