Page 247 - Religion in the Media Age Media, Religion & Culture
P. 247

236  Public religious culture post-09/11/01

              importantly, perhaps, what can they tell us about the future of relations
              between religion and media, and the future of the religion/media interac-
              tion in the forming and shaping of religious, social, and cultural life? As
              we’ve seen here, meaning-making in relation to media culture involves
              both formal and received resources and resources that are emergent and in
              dispute. As we will see, important events and trends such as 9/11 and the
              role of religion in the election easily (and rather unproblematically) flow
              into the inventory of symbolic resources out of which we make religious
              and spiritual sense in the media age. And, in so doing, they point to the
              extent to which the interaction between religion and media in late moder-
              nity has become an increasingly profound and far-reaching one.


              Religion and media in 9/11 and its aftermath
              It is trite to say that the events of September 11, 2001 were unprecedented
              in their scope and effect. No major city in the “Group of Eight” industrial-
              ized countries had experienced such a major loss of life from an intentional
              act of violence in peacetime. A strike at the heart of American commerce
                                      2
              and media with such surprise galvanized the world and the nation.
              Throughout the world, at least the Western world, it is now conventional
              to use the term “9/11” to describe the events, and to think of international
              relations and global politics in “pre-9/11” and “post-9/11” terms. A great
              deal of public and scholarly comment has followed, focusing on everything
              from the security implications of the attacks to their impact on public
              consciousness, locally, nationally, and internationally.
                The religious subtext of the attacks has also been an important, if prob-
              lematic, element of discussion and debate. The barbarism of the events
              scandalized the world, and there has been an ongoing effort to reconcile
              them with their claimed roots in religion. A much-feared anti-Arab or anti-
                                                               3
              Islamic backlash did not materialize to any great degree, but it could be
              argued that, in a more subtle way, smaller-scale reactions against Islam
              and against people of Middle-Eastern and/or Muslim descent continues,
              and underlies certain political debates and repercussions that continue to
              gather force both in the US and elsewhere. 4
                In keeping with the theme of this book, however, it is important to
              understand the attacks as significant for the interaction between religion
              and media that they represented and continue to represent. They simply
              would not have had the same force or effect without the media. At the
              same time, they brought religion to the fore in new and unprecedented
              ways, ways that have forever shaped the way we see its contributions to
              politics, public discourse, social change, and political struggle. Further, the
              fact that religion and media interacted in these events is also significant.
                The media, religion, and religion and media together were important in
              the events and their aftermath in four ways. First,  the media were the
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252