Page 26 - Religion in the Media Age Media, Religion & Culture
P. 26

What this book could be about  15

            conveying the fundamental ideas of the culture, the media can now be seen
                           40
            to be in that role. A concern with ideological or definitive power can be
            said to underlie critiques such as Malcolm Muggeridge’s classic Christ and
            the Media. The idea that media and religion exist in a state of ideological
                     41
            struggle is implicit in more recent works of the same vein, including, for
            example, Ken Meyers’s  All God’s Children and Blue Suede Shoes, 42
            Dancing in the Dark by Quentin Schultze and his associates, Schultze’s
                                                                 43
            more recent  Habits of the High-Tech Heart, 44  Neil Postman’s  Amusing
            Ourselves to Death, 45  William Fore’s  Television and Religion, 46  and less
            scholarly but noteworthy efforts such as Michael Medved’s Hollywood vs.
            America and William Bennett’s  Book of Virtues. All of these share in
                   47
                                                       48
            common the idea that we know, inductively, what religion is, and that
            fundamental questions surround a conflict between that ideal of religion
            and the reality of contemporary media of various forms. And, most of
            them lament that “the media” seem to be “winning.”
              Gerbner was involved in a second, more focused scholarly direction,
            one that looks at the effects of media on religion and vice versa rooted in
            the dominant “effects” paradigm of US mass-media research. The emer-
            gence of televangelism occasioned a significant amount of debate and
            research when it emerged in the 1970s. Gerbner’s “cultural indicators”
            project at the University of Pennsylvania, in co-operation with researchers
            from the Gallup Organization and the distinguished religion sociologist
            Robert Wuthnow, conducted what was to have been the definitive study of
            the phenomenon. Other significant effects-oriented work includes a series
                          49
            of studies by Judith Buddenbaum on religion journalism and the journal-
            ists who cover religion, and other studies of religion and the press. 51
                               50
              A third significant school of thought related to religion and media has
            emerged within media scholarship, that which looks at the media in terms of
            the religious or quasi-religious functions around rituals of identity and social
            solidarity. The most important of these is the very influential project by
            Daniel Dayan and Elihu Katz published as  Media Events: The Live
                                 52
            Broadcasting of History. A more comprehensive review of the solidarity
            and ritual literature, based in a Durkheimian framework, is Eric
            Rothenbuhler’s  Ritual Communication. 53  Also from the field of mass
            communication and media studies are Carolyn Marvin’s Blood Sacrifice and
            the Nation and Nick Couldry’s critical review of this literature in Media
                     54
                  55
            Rituals. Implicit in these and other works is the notion fundamental to the
            work of social theorist Emile Durkheim, that religion is integral to the form
            and shape of society. Further, according to Durkheim, society and religion
            meet and diverge around questions of identity and social solidarity, with
            social rituals being the context where these issues are worked out. 56
              A fourth area of research and theory-building in media scholarship
            related to religion traces its roots to a now classic essay by James Carey,
            titled “A cultural approach to communication.” In it, Carey describes a
                                                     57
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31