Page 287 - Religion in the Media Age Media, Religion & Culture
P. 287

276  Conclusion: what is produced?

              already noted the tendency for people here to think of the media as some-
              thing that they simply “do.” Their mode of practice in this “doing” seems
              to follow its own logics, not the sort of cognitive, deliberative course that
              we might have wanted or expected.


              Children and autonomy
              Another matter of negotiation emerges when we look at how people in our
              interviews thought of themselves as parents and the appropriate relation-
                                                                      12
              ship between media and religion/spirituality in relation to children. As we
              noted in Chapter 7, many of those households we might expect to take the
              most moralistic stance toward media, the “born-agains” and “dogma-
              tists,” did not universally do so. Born-again believers, in particular, tended
              to shy away from the sense that it was up to them to protect their children
              from “bad” media. Even Glenn Donegal, who we declared a “dogmatist,”
              expressed the view we might call “pedagogical” as opposed to “prophy-
              lactic” when it comes to media and children. “We want them to know that
              life is full of choices,” Karl Callahan said in Chapter 6. The notion that
              parenting should be about helping children make autonomous media
              choices on their own fits with the overall theme of autonomous choice
              we’ve seen develop throughout these interviews. It makes sense that adults
              who feel autonomous and empowered to make their own decisions and
              draw their own conclusions would see their role as helping their children
              develop the same skills.
                We might have expected such a view from the “mainstream believers”
              and “metaphysical seekers” among our interviews, due to received
              assumptions about the relationship between social class and ideas about
              parenting. We might also then have expected our more “conservative”
              parents to be more moralistic and controlling with their children. Instead,
              nearly all of our parents here, across Roof’s categories, expressed an
              “account of media” that the proper role of parents vis-à-vis media is to
              equip their children with the skills and values they need to make their own
              choices, not attempt to protect them from things they should not see. This
              was true even for parents who otherwise expressed the most moralistic
              “accounts of media.” It seems that, in the context of the ubiquitous
              “common culture” of the media, where few parents have chosen to avoid
              media altogether, most have concluded that the appropriate response is to
              prepare their children to interact with it, rather than attempt to avoid it.


              Social class
              We have not, to this point, discussed questions of social class in any detail.
              While issues of class and class interests underlie a good deal of culturalist
              media studies, I’ve argued for an approach here that looks beyond ques-
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292