Page 228 - Religion, Media, and the Public Sphere
P. 228

now aggressively marketed to Egyptian consumers as a haven for sanitized “folk-
            lore”); then a delightful Meatland advertisement in which chickens and cows
            cluck and moo to the tune of the “1812 Overture” as their carcasses are ef¤-
            ciently hacked up in a clean industrial packing plant; juice concentrate, corn oil,
            smokers toothpaste, more wedding dresses, crystal chandeliers. In an intriguing
            Juhayna Yogurt advertisement a cow metamorphosed into a beautiful spinning
            woman. A perfume ad showed a woman who appeared to be going out on a date
            (she is shown waiting to be being picked up by a handsome man in a red sports
               21
            car).  And, ¤nally, the advertising segment ends.  22
              In terms of ®ow, the overall effect was that the handful of state-sponsored
            and religious messages blended into a veritable sea of commercialism. If, as
            Raymond Williams (1975, 92) argues, television programming creates an “irre-
            sponsible ®ow of images and feelings,” then as a whole this segment sutured
            religious discourse with commoditization, even as, in more formal terms, it
            sought to set off the formally religious from the commercial.


                  Fawazir Ramadan
                  When I ¤rst watched Fawazir Ramadan in 1986 the program attracted
            a large audience. In that year I often attended iftar with a lower-middle-class
            family. This particular family had two daughters, and although the Fawazir
            were an aggressively secular counterpoint to a religious holiday, it would not be
            far wrong to say that they watched them religiously, missing few, if any, episodes.
            They were also trying to guess the answers to the riddles, for reasons we will
            come to shortly.
              In 1986 Fawazir Ramadan (not, I should note, the program broadcast in the
            year described below) was a mass ritual. I generally joined the iftar, then stayed
            through the Fawazir, which began about an hour and a half after iftar (just after
            the "isha# call to prayer) and lasted for roughly an hour. After the Fawazir I re-
            turned home or went on to other social engagements. The family I was visiting
            found it odd if I tried to leave early, and it appeared that their pattern was typi-
            cal. When the sign-off music of the Fawazir program played I said my good-
            byes and headed for the street. When leaving their apartment the streets were
            usually empty but ¤lling rapidly. Everyone seemed to be leaving at the same
            time. On the occasions when I did leave early the streets were abandoned, and
            the program could be heard wafting from many a window.
              The popularity of the Fawazir Ramadan is not constant. In 1994, for example,
            the Fawazir program was either losing its hold over audiences or was perhaps
                                                           23
            getting lost in an increasingly large shuf®e of programming.  My own percep-
            tion of the popularity of the program might also have been affected by segmen-
            tation of the audience. By 1994 most of my friends and acquaintances were
            male college students. In all likelihood homebound people (disproportionately
            women) are more avid watchers than those who enjoy higher mobility (i.e.,
            men). It is also probable that the Fawazir Ramadan more effectively hailed a
            lower-class audience than an af®uent one.

                                               Synchronizing Watches  217
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233