Page 32 - Religion, Media, and the Public Sphere
P. 32

culturally speci¤c ways of producing meaning in media consumption. Although current
            anthropological work on the media moves beyond this rather limited orientation, the
            anthropology of media is now still mainly associated with a focus on the mass media,
            making up, in a way, for the shortcomings of media studies while at the same time adopt-
            ing its conceptual framework. In the two recent handbooks on media and anthropology
            (Askew and Wilk 2002; Ginsburg, Abu-Lughod, and Larkin 2002) virtually all contribu-
            tions focus on modern electronic mass media, ¤lm, photography, radio, or TV. Although
            we sincerely welcome anthropology’s turn to the media in the 1990s, we deem it impor-
            tant to realize that the media should not simply be equated with mass media and that, if
            we do so, we conceive of the anthropology of media too narrowly.
               5. The importance of mass literacy for the fragmentation of religious authority has
            been addressed, for example, in Eickelman (1992) and Messick (1993), and in the con-
            tributions to Anthropological Quarterly 68 (1995) about print, writing, and the politics
            of religious identity in the Middle East. For a discussion of religious authority in relation
            to the shift away from orality and literacy, see Probst 1987 (with regard to Africa) and
            Goody (1977, 41ff.).
               6. In this sense the New York Times article quoted at the beginning of this introduc-
            tion is misleading in that it assumes a situation in which religion had not yet found tech-
            nology.
               7. The production and reception of fatwas (learned opinions), for instance, is very
            different under conditions of face-to-face interaction, in the case of radio-muftis broad-
            casting to an anonymous public (Messick 1996), or in the case of cybermuftis whose
            identity may well be up in the air. Since the mid-1990s there has been a tremendous
            growth of Islamic websites, many of which also distribute fatwas.




                  References

            Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1993a. Islam and Public Culture: The Politics of Egyptian Television
              Serials. Middle East Reports 23 (1): 25–31.
            1.  1993b. Finding a Place for Islam: Egyptian Television Serials and the National
              Interest. Public Culture 5:493–513.
            Alexander, Bobby C. 1997. Televangelism: Redressive Ritual within a Larger Social Drama.
              In Rethinking Media, Religion, and Culture, ed. Stewart M. Hoover and Knut Lundby,
              194–208. London: Sage.
            Allievi, Stefano, and Jorge Nielsen, eds. 2003, Muslim Networks and Transnational Com-
              munities in and across Europe. Leiden: Brill.
            Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Re®ections on the Origins and Spread
              of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso.
            Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Min-
              neapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
            Armbrust, Walter. 1996. Mass Culture and Modernism in Egypt. New York: Cambridge
              University Press.
            Armbrust, Walter, ed. 2000. Mass Mediations: New Approaches to Popular Culture in the
              Middle East and Beyond. Berkeley: University of California Press.
            Arthur, Chris, ed. 1993. Religion and the Media: An Introductory Reader. Cardiff: Univer-
              sity of Wales Press.

                                                       Introduction  21
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37