Page 196 -
P. 196

7.12  Summary     183




                  be hard to convince some critical readers that case study research is worthwhile.
                  “This study only includes one participant,” they might say, “so how can we apply it
                  to others?”
                     Case studies that make broad claims of generality are particularly likely to in-
                  furiate these critics, who may feel that any generalization from case studies is inap-
                  propriate. When conducting and describing case study research, always take care to
                  remember the limits of this approach, and try to avoid making claims that cannot be
                  sustained by a small number of cases.
                     Although concerns about validity and reliability are certainly appropriate, critics
                  of case studies risk the loss of a valuable research tool. In digging deep into concrete
                  situations, they can help researchers identify design particulars that are likely to go
                  unnoticed by research in usability labs. In focusing on specific situations, they provide
                  concrete illustrations of needs, motivations, and successes or failures. As explanatory
                  tools, they take requirements from the abstract to the specific. Particularly when pre-
                  sented alongside complementary user studies that provide broader-based data, case
                  studies can paint rich pictures that deepen our understanding of complex phenomena.
                     Case studies succeed when they build upon the fundamental human activity of
                  learning through story-telling. If your case study can use the details of a specific
                  situation to tell the story behind some HCI research question, it will succeed in its
                  ultimate goal of increasing understanding and communicating that understanding to
                  a broader audience.


                  DISCUSSION QUESTIONS


                  1.  Case studies can be useful tools for exploring user requirements for software
                    tools, but they present challenges: given a small number of cases, your results
                    may not be generally applicable. Some user requirements from a case study
                    might be easy to implement with minimal impact on a design—these might be
                    included even if they are not of broad interest. Other requirements might require
                    fundamental changes to system design. How can you be confident that you
                    have gained a thorough, general understanding that is suitable for designing an
                    application of broader interest? If additional cases are not available, how might
                    you use other HCI research techniques to bolster your confidence in the results
                    of your case study?
                  2.  Case studies involve working closely with individuals who may have a
                    substantial interest in the results of your work. This might lead some participants
                    to put “spin” on their interactions with you, framing their activities and
                    responses to questions to increase the likelihood of achieving their desired
                    outcomes. How might you design your study and choose your data sources to
                    account for this concern?
                  3.  Although the case study of Sara's use of technology is a good example of case-
                    study research, our discussion of it represents a different type of case study:
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201