Page 391 -
P. 391

13.4  Physiological tools  381




                  13.4  PHYSIOLOGICAL TOOLS

                  Our bodies are intricate devices, with numerous interrelated systems that change
                  their behavior as we are excited, frustrated, or otherwise aroused. Each cell in our
                  body is part of an electrical system, with voltage levels that differ across cell mem-
                  branes and change under the right conditions (Stern et al., 2001). Blood flow, heart
                  rate, rate of breathing, and electrical conductivity of various parts of the body are just
                  a few of the measures that have been studied in an attempt to better understand these
                  responses. The combination of these physiological measures with more traditional
                  study of task performance and subjective responses is known as psychophysiology
                  (Wastell and Newman, 1996).
                     Psychophysiology brings the possibility of using concrete measurements of the
                  state of the human body to accompany assessments captured through surveys or ob-
                  servations. Imagine a study of user frustration levels with a series of alternative inter-
                  face designs. You might start by asking participants to complete a series of tasks with
                  each interface. After they complete the tasks, you could ask the users to complete one
                  or more questionnaires aimed at understanding frustration levels. You might even ask
                  them which features of the designs were more or less frustrating.
                     Even though this might be a fine design for your study, it misses some potentially
                  important and interesting information. For example, when were the users most frus-
                  trated? Were they frustrated on the same task for each interface or did some designs
                  cause less frustration on some tasks and more frustration on others? Postfact ques-
                  tionnaires are simply too coarse-grained to address these questions. The retrospective
                  nature of questionnaires means that you are relying on the participants' fallible and
                  incomplete memories to get your results.
                     Suppose your careful and thorough reading of the appropriate literature tells you
                  that increases in frustration lead to increases in heart rate. With some sensors, re-
                  cording equipment, and appropriate training in their use, you could change your
                  experiment to monitor heart rate during task completion time. Appropriate tools
                  for synchronizing the physiological data with other data that you collect during the
                  tasks—such as task completion time or fine-grained records of all activities—will
                  let you see exactly what the participant was doing when he became most frustrated.
                  Correlating this information with feedback from the subjective questionnaire will
                  provide you with a much fuller picture than you would have been able to get from
                  only the task performance data and subjective responses.

                  13.4.1   PHYSIOLOGICAL DATA

                  Appropriate use of physiological data for research requires an understanding of
                  the types of data that can be collected, the tools required for data collection, and
                  the ways in which these data sources respond to various stimuli. Skin conductiv-
                  ity, blood flow, and respiration rate (to name a few examples) are very different
                  measures, each presenting a variety of challenges in terms of both collection and
                  interpretation.
   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396