Page 17 - Reservoir Formation Damage
P. 17

2    Reservoir Formation Damage


             under  stress  and  fluid  shear.  These  processes  are  triggered  during  the
             drilling,  production,  workover,  and  hydraulic  fracturing  operations.  For-
             mation  damage  indicators include permeability impairment,  skin  damage,
             and  decrease  of  well  performance.  As  stated  by  Porter  (1989),  "Forma-
             tion  damage  is  not  necessarily  reversible"  and  "What  gets  into  porous
             media  does not necessarily  come  out."  Porter  (1989)  called  this  phenom-
             enon  "the  reverse  funnel  effect."  Therefore,  it  is  better  to  avoid  forma-
             tion  damage  than to  try  to  restore  it. A verified formation  damage  model
             and  carefully  planned  laboratory  and  field  tests  can  provide  scientific
             guidance  and  help  develop  strategies  to  avoid  or  minimize  formation
             damage.  Properly  designed  experimental  and  analytical  techniques,  and
             the modeling and  simulation  approaches  can help  understanding, diagno-
             sis,  evaluation,  prevention,  remediation,  and  controlling  of  formation
             damage  in  oil  and  gas  reservoirs.
               The  consequences  of formation  damage  are  the  reduction of  the  oil  and
             gas  productivity  of  reservoirs  and  noneconomic  operation.  Therefore,  it
             is  essential  to  develop  experimental  and  analytical  methods  for  under-
             standing  and  preventing  and/or  controlling  formation  damage  in  oil  and
             gas bearing  formations  (Energy  Highlights,  1990). The laboratory  experi-
             ments  are  important  steps  in  reaching  understanding  of  the  physical
             basis  of  formation  damage  phenomena.  "From  this  experimental  basis,
             realistic  models  which allow extrapolation  outside the  scaleable  range may
             be  constructed"  (Energy  Highlights,  1990).  These  efforts  are  necessary
             to  develop  and  verify  accurate  mathematical  models  and computer simu-
             lators  that can  be used  for  predicting  and determining  strategies  to  avoid
             and/or  mitigate  formation  damage  in petroleum  reservoirs  (Civan,  1994).
               Confidence  in  formation  damage  prediction  using  phenomenological
             models  cannot  be  gained  without  field  testing.  Planning  and  designing
             field  test  procedures  for  verification  of  the  mathematical  models  are
             important.  Once  a  model  has  been  validated,  it  can  be  used  for  accurate
             simulation  of  the  reservoir  formation  damage.  Current  techniques  for
             reservoir  characterization  by  history  matching  do  not  consider  the  alter-
             ation  of  the  characteristics  of  reservoir  formation  during petroleum  pro-
             duction. In reality, formation characteristics  vary  and  a formation  damage
             model  can  help  to  incorporate  this  variation  into  the  history  matching
             process  for  accurate  characterization  of  reservoir  systems  and,  hence,  an
             accurate  prediction  of  future  performance.  Formation  damage  is  an  ex-
             citing, challenging,  and evolving field  of research.  Eventually, the  research
             efforts  will  lead  to  a  better  understanding  and  simulation  tools  that  can
             be  used  for  model-assisted  analysis  of  rock,  fluid,  and  particle  interac-
             tions  and  the  processes  caused  by  rock  deformation  and  scientific guid-
             ance  for  development  of  production  strategies  for  formation  damage
             control  in  petroleum  reservoirs.
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22