Page 77 - Reservoir Formation Damage
P. 77

60    Reservoir Formation Damage

                where  D  denotes  the  diameter,  f\(D)  and  / 2(^)  are  the  distribution
                functions  for  the  fine  and  coarse  fractions,  and  w  is  the  fraction  of  the
                fine  fractions.
                  Popplewell  et  al.  (1988,  1989)  used  the  p-distribution  function  to
                represent  the  skewed  size  distribution,  because  the  diameters  of  the
                smallest  and the largest  particles  are finite in  realistic  porous  media.  For
                convenience,  they expressed  the  P-distribution function  in  the following
                modified  from:


                                              m
                                 m
                   f(x)  = x am (l-x) /  \x am (\-x} dx                    (3-19)
                                  I  J
                in  which  jc  denotes  a  normalized  diameter  defined  by:

                                                                           (3-20)

                     and      are  the  smallest  and  the  largest  diameters,  respectively, a
                £> min   £> max
                and  m  are  some  empirical  power  coefficients.  The  mode,  x m,  and  the
                        2
                spread,  a ,  for  Equation  3-19 are  given,  respectively, by:
                   x m=a/(a +                                              (3-21)

                and

                             (am + l)(m +1)
                                                                           (3-22)


                Chang  and  Civan  (1991,  1992, 1997) used  this  approach  successfully in
                a  model  for  chemically  induced  formation  damage.

                Fractal  Distribution.  Fractal  is  a  concept  used  for  convenient mathe-
                matical  description  of  irregular  shapes  or  patterns,  such  as  the  pores  of
                rocks,  assuming  self-similarity.  The  pore  size  distributions  measured  at
                different  scales of resolution have  been  shown  to be  adequately  described
                by  empirically  determined power law  functions  of the  pore  sizes (Garrison
                et  al.,  1993; Verrecchia,  1995; Karacan  and Okandan,  1995; Perrier  et al.,
                1996).  The  expression  given  by  Perrier  et  al.  (1996)  for  the  differential
                pore  size  distribution  can  be  written  in  terms  of  the  pore  diameter  as:

                    dV_              l
                                      , 0<d<e                              (3-23)
                    dD
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82