Page 42 -
P. 42

3 Types of Simulation                                           35

            Further Reading


            Gilbert and Troitzsch (2005) also have sections that describe the different kinds
            of simulation available. Railsback and Grimm (2011) present a complementary
            analysis, coming from ecological modelling. The introductory chapters in (Gilbert
            and Doran 1994) and (Conte and Gilbert 1995) map out many of the key issues and
            aspects in which social simulation has developed.



            References

            Amblard, F., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2017). Social networks and spatial distribution.
              doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66948-9_19.
            Anderson, J. R., et al. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4),
              1036–1060.
            Barreteau, O., Bots, P., Daniell, K., Etienne, M., Perez, P., Barnaud, C., et al. (2017). Participatory
              approaches. In B. Edmonds & R. Meyer (Eds.), Simulating social complexity: A handbook.
              Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
            Bazzan, A.L.C., & Bordini, R.H. (2001). A framework for the simulation of agents with emotions:
              Report on experiments with the iterated prisoners dilemma. In Fifth international conference
              on autonomous agents, Montreal, 2001 (pp. 292–299). New York: ACM Press.
            Bratman, M. E. (1987). Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
              University Press.
            Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Huang, Z., Hulstijn, J., & Van der Torre, L. (2001). The BOID archi-
              tecture: Conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. In Fifth international
              conference on autonomous agents, Montreal, 2001 (pp. 9–16). New York: ACM Press.
            Chen, D., Theodoropoulos, G. K., Turner, S. J., Cai, W., Minson, R., & Zhang, Y. (2008).
              Large-scale agent-based simulation on the grid. Future Generation Computer Systems, 24(7),
              658–671.
            Conte, R., & Gilbert, N. (Eds.). (1995). Artificial societies: The computer simulation of social life.
              London: UCL Press.
            David, N., Fachada, N., & Rosa, A. C. (2017). Verifying and validating simulations. In B. Edmonds
              &R.Meyer (Eds.), Simulating social complexity: A handbook. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
            Davidsson, P. (2000). Multi agent based simulation: Beyond social simulation. In S. Moss & P.
              Davidsson (Eds.), Multi agent based simulation, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 1979,
              pp. 98–107). Berlin: Springer.
            Dignum, V. (2013). Organisational design. In B. Edmonds & R. Meyer (Eds.), Simulating social
              complexity – A handbook (pp. 541–562). Berlin: Springer.
            Edmonds, B., Lucas, P., Rouchier, J., & Taylor, R. (2017). Human societies: Understanding
              observed social phenomena. In B. Edmonds & R. Meyer (Eds.), Simulating social complexity:
              A handbook. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
            Gardner, M. (1970). Mathematical games: The fantastic combinations of John Conway’s new
              solitaire game “Life”. Scientific American, 223(4), 120–124.
            Geller, A., & Moss, S. (2017). Modeling power and authority: An emergentist view from
              Afghanistan. In B. Edmonds & R. Meyer (Eds.), Simulating social complexity: A handbook.
              Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
            Georgeff, M., Pell, B., Pollack, M., Tambe, M., & Wooldridge, M. (1998). The belief-desire-
              intention model of agency. In J. Muller, M. Singh, & A. Rao (Eds.), Intelligent agents V, Lecture
              notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 1555, pp. 1–10). Berlin: Springer.
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47