Page 79 -
P. 79

62  2. Introductory applications



          expansion. The problem posed in (2.11) is therefore regular, resulting in a uniformly
          valid asymptotic expansion.
            More complete, formal and rigorous discussions of uniform validity,  in the context
          of differential equations, can be found in other texts, such as Smith (1985), O’Malley
          (1991) and Eckhaus (1979). Typically, these arguments involve writing




          where                      and then showing that  remains bounded for
                 and for       We  will  outline how  this can  be applied  to  our problem,
          (2.11); first, we obtain





          with             for      Since each    satisfies  an  appropriate  differential
          equation and boundary condition, this gives





          where    comprises the    terms, and smaller,  from the  expansion of   (after
          division by    A uniform asymptotic expansion requires that  is  bounded  as
                for       and       To  prove  such a result is rarely an elementary exercise
          in general,  and  it  is not trivial here,  although a  number of approaches are  possible.
          One method is based on Picard’s iterative scheme (which is a standard technique
          for proving the existence  of solutions of first order ordinary  differential  equations in
          some appropriate region of (x, y)-space); this will be described in any good basic text
          on ordinary differential equations  (e.g. Boyce & DiPrima,  2001). Another possibility,
          closely  related to  Picards method,  is  formally to  integrate the  equation for
          thereby obtaining an  integral  equation, and  then  to  derive  estimates for the integral
          term  (and hence for   We  will  outline a  third  technique,  which  involves the
          construction of estimates directly for the differential equation,  and then integrating a
          reduced version of the  equation for
            At this stage we do not know if   is of one sign, for   or if it changes
          sign on  this  interval;  however, we  may  proceed without  specifying or assuming  the
          nature of this property, but it will affect the details; first we write





          But we  do  know that each  is bounded (for   and hence so is   which
          we will express in the form   (a constant independent of   and so
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84