Page 86 -
P. 86

69



          which the interested  reader  may  wish  to derive.)  The two  ‘expansions  of expan-
          sions’,  (2.31) and  (2.32),  match when  we  choose  and
          the asymptotic expansion for X = O(1) is therefore





          We now  observe  that, although  the  expansion  (2.27) is  not  defined on x = 0,  the
          expansion valid for    does allow evaluation on x = 0 i.e. X = 0; indeed, from
          (2.33), we see that





            In summary,  the procedure involves the  construction of an asymptotic  expansion
          valid for x = O(1) and applying the boundary condition(s) if the expansion remains
          valid  here. The expansion  is  then  examined for   seeking  any breakdowns,
          rescaling and hence rewriting the equation in terms of the new,  scaled variable; this
          problem is  then  solved as  another  asymptotic expansion, matching  as  necessary.  A
          couple of general  observations  are  prompted by  this example.  First, the  matching
          principle has been  used to  determine the  arbitrary  constants of integration because
          the boundary  condition does not sit  where   thus the process of matching
          is equivalent, here,  to  imposing boundary conditions  (and thereby obtaining unique
          solutions for     In the context of differential equations, this is the usual role of
          the matching principle, and it is fundamental in seeking complete solutions.
            The second issue is rather more general. In this example, the expansion for x = O(1),
          (2.27),  had to be  taken to the term at   before  the non-uniformity (as
          became evident. This prompts  the  obvious  question: how  many  terms  should be
          determined so  that we  can be  (reasonably) sure  that all  possible  contributions to  a
          breakdown have  been identified?  A  very good  rule of thumb is  to  ensure that  the
          asymptotic expansion contains information generated by every term in the differential
          equation. Thus our recent example, (2.26),






          requires   terms to include the nonlinearity   and   terms for the dominant
          representation of the varying part of the  variable coefficient. In  a  physically based
          problem, the interpretation of this rule is simply to ensure that every different physical
          effect is included at some stage in the expansion. As an example of this idea, consider
          the nonlinear, damped oscillator with variable frequency described by the equation:
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91