Page 129 - Smart Thinking: Skills for Critical Understanding and Writing, 2nd Ed
P. 129

11 6  SMART THINKING: SKILLS FOR CRITICAL UNDERSTANDING & WRITING

       profession in which you are working or studying, underlie the identification of
       these sources?

       Five possible outcomes

       Finding information effectively is, in large measure, a matter of understanding how
       that information or knowledge is to be used in your own arguments and explan-
       ations. Often we simply want some basic descriptive information to serve as claims
       in our reasoning without wanting to provide extensive supporting arguments. For
       instance, we read, in relation to our nationalistic advertisements investigation, that
       Crocodile Dundee was one of the most popular films ever screened in Australia. We
       can simply state this piece of information, either quoting exactly from the original
       or re-expressing the information in our own words, giving an appropriate reference
           12
       to it.  We are simply taking a single claim from our 'source'.
          We can also take an entire argument or explanation from our 'source'. We could
       quote such reasoning exactly, but usually, for stylistic reasons, we express it in our
       own words. For example, James's article (mentioned above) argues that nationalistic
       advertisements encourage consumers to purchase a corporation's products because,
       by being 'Australian' (even when the companies are often owned by foreign inter-
       ests), the products are assumed to be better than others. We are, in effect, getting
       claims and links (reasoning) from the 'source' (can you see the trace of linking in
       'because'?). Once again, we provide a reference in order to acknowledge our debt
       to the original author.
          Yet very often what we want to 'take' from these sources is not that specific and
       cannot simply be 'found' by looking at a certain page. Instead, we can summarise
       the basic argument or explanation in a source that we have read (always in our own
       words), reducing a long text to a short series of premises and a conclusion, which
       we can then use in our own argument (again, with an appropriate reference). For
       example, Anderson's Imagined Communities is a long and detailed work on nation-
       alism that, in part, concludes that technologies that allow humans to overcome
       geographical distance (for example, railways) have played a significant role in the
       creation of modern nations. We could include such a summary (which, of course,
       can be expressed in the analytical format in our notes) within our own reasoning.
       We are, thus, taking from the source not a specific claim, nor a specific piece of
       reasoning, but our understanding (analytically speaking) of the source's overall
       argument or explanation.
          Fourth, we can take from sources a type of information that is far more in-
       definable than the information gained in any of the last three cases. This category
       can be summed up as 'positions and values'. It is usually hidden within the source
       and can be recovered using your judgment (based on what you read or hear) of the
       underlying position that the author of the source holds. This underlying position
       can be inferred from that person's own arguments or explanations, or the way in
       which the arguments or explanations have been received by others. We read, for
                                               15
       example, in Graeme Turner's Making It National  that Australian businesses
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134