Page 189 - Smart Thinking: Skills for Critical Understanding and Writing, 2nd Ed
P. 189

176 GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS AND CONCEPTS

     burden of proof
     In any situation involving reasoning, we can discuss the degree of support needed
     for a conclusion to be acceptable in terms of the 'burden of proof on the person
     presenting the argument or explanation. Burdens of proof are usually implied and
     contextual. (See chapter 6.)

     casting
     Casting is a process of looking at someone else's argument or explanation, in the narra-
     tive form, and then recovering from that form, an analytical structure which is done
     best by marking claims and traces of reasoning in the text, and then drawing a diagram
     to show the interlinkage of those claims. Casting is most usefully used as a way of
     building your understanding of reasoning, so that you can use the analytical structure
     format from scratch for your own arguments and explanations. (See chapter 3.)

     cause, reasoning from
     The conclusion proposes the relationship between cause and effect; the premises
     give evidence about the cause or causes and show why it is that the effect relates to
     that cause or causes. The key questions to ask in relation to reasoning from cause
     concern similarities and differences that might reveal the cause(s). Care is needed
     to avoid assuming a causal relationship when two events are simply coincidental or
     are both effects of an underlying cause. (See chapter 7.)

     certainty
     The measurement of probability involved in a claim; an important property in
     well-formed claims, useful in assessing the degree of support necessary for a partic-
     ular conclusion. A conclusion and its premises are said to be 'coherent' in certainty
     when there is little variation in the measure of probability that all the claims make.
     The certainty component of a claim is often implicit but, in good reasoning, should
     be stated explicitly. Compare with scope. (See chapter 2.)

     circular reasoning
     A false form of reasoning in which the premise(s) appears to be different from the
     conclusion but which in fact is a restatement of that conclusion. You cannot reason
     for a claim by using the same claim again. (See chapter 4.)
     claim
     A claim is a statement that represents some event or idea about the way the world is
     or should be. It is distinguishable from other statements because, when considering a
     claim, it is possible to ask 'is this statement true or false?'. In relation to value claims,
     'true or false' may be better expressed as 'sound or unsound'. (See chapter 2).
     complex structure
     Arguments and explanations are complex when they involve more than two layers
     of claims, that is, when they have premises that lead to a conclusion, and claims
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194