Page 49 - Smart Thinking: Skills for Critical Understanding and Writing, 2nd Ed
P. 49

36  SMART THINKING: SKILLS FOR CRITICAL UNDERSTANDING & WRITING
      diagrammed. Because the first layer of the diagram does not lead directly to the
      conclusion, but instead to claim 1, we can call the argument supporting claim 1 a
      sub-argument. It is subsidiary (though still important) to the main argument for
      claim 5. We just add one diagram to the other, overlapping the common claim:






                      A;          1         7*-


                            W © - 0





                                          Y
                                        ©



         Theoretically, there is no limit to the ways that simple arguments can combine
      in this manner, but for practical purposes, we may want to limit ourselves to no
      more than three or four levels of claims, so that the process does not become
      unwieldy. But it is crucial that we understand the basic idea behind complex
      structures. Any conclusion is, at base, a claim for which premises are being given.
      There is nothing to stop that claim from simultaneously serving as a premise itself,
      which leads to another conclusion.
      Exercise 3.6


      Let us return to casting to assist our examination of complex structures. To help
      you understand them, work through the following exercise and then refer to the
      answers. There is more guidance there about how to cast but, until you have tried
      it yourself, you will not be able to understand that assistance. You must cast this
      argument, realising that it has a complex argument structure.
         The current Australian government is, in many ways, challenging the role of
         the United Nations as a body that promotes action by member nations to
         maintain and extend human rights within those nations' own jurisdiction.
         This challenge has a distinct and dangerous consequence for Australia
         (quite apart from arguments about its dubious morality) because the chal-
         lenge puts Australia in conflict with most other nations of the world over
         human rights and Australian trade and foreign relations are likely to suffer
         in the long run. By definition, this long-term result is dangerous. I believe
         that the government's role should be to work to avoid danger and, therefore,
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54