Page 9 - Smart Thinking: Skills for Critical Understanding and Writing, 2nd Ed
P. 9

Preface to First Edition



     The study and teaching of critical thinking (also known as informal logic) is
     relatively rare in Australia. There is little to guide the keen student or teacher in the
     development of skills for analysis and reasoning in everyday work and study. The
     orientation of most of the available books on this subject is more traditionally
     logical, and this orientation further complicates the process of teaching and
     learning applied critical thinking skills, since it tends to remove the use of reasoning
     and logical analysis from even its most basic social contexts.
        Smart Thinking'is designed to provide a simple, but not simplistic, guide for the
     development of critical thinking and analytical skills. It combines the undoubted
     strengths of the informal logical approach with a newer—but often-overlooked—
     insight: that reasoning and analysis are always communicative acts. I would not
     pretend that one can easily resolve the epistemological tensions between, on the one
     hand, the commonly held commitments to objective judgment and truth that
     underpin 'logic' as a mode of analysis and, on the other, the social relativism and
     intersubjectivity that a communicative-theory approach demands. However, from
     a pragmatic point of view, there is considerable profit to be gained from letting
     these two distinct approaches jostle alongside one another. Moreover, for all my
     attempts to keep competing epistemological ideas to a minimum in Smart
     Thinking, the book cannot remain purely 'practical'. Simple advice on 'better
     thinking' rubs up against deep and important matters of philosophy in a way that,
     I hope, creates a constructive interaction between the ease with which one can
     begin to improve one's thinking and the complexity of thinking about smart
     thinking.
        While I myself work theoretically within post-structuralist frameworks, Smart
     Thinkings bias towards communicative issues stems primarily from the very
     practical experiences I had in developing and teaching a critical thinking unit
     (Applied Reasoning 200) at Curtin University of Technology in Perth. On the basis
     of my experiences with many hundreds of students, I am confident in asserting that
     it is wrong to divorce analytical thinking from its communicative context. Outside
     the narrow confines of some academic disciplines, communication takes place on a


     VII I
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14