Page 60 - Socially Intelligent Agents Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots
P. 60

Developing Agents Who Can Relate to Us                            43

                              7.     Conclusion

                                If we want to put artificial agents truly into the "human-loop" then they will
                              need to be able to reciprocate our ability to relate to them, including relating to
                              them relating to us etc. In order to do this it is likely that the development of the
                              agent’s self-modelling will have to be co-developed with its modelling of the
                              humans it interacts with. Just as our self-modelling has started to be influenced
                              by our interaction with computers and robots [22], their self-modelling should
                              be rooted in our abilities. One algorithm for this has been suggested which
                              is backed up by a theory of the development of the human self. Others are
                              possible. I argue elsewhere that if we carry on attempting a pure design stance
                              with respect to the agents we create we will not be able to achieve an artificial
                              intelligence (at least not one that would pass the Turing Test) [13]. In addition
                              to this failure will be the lack of an ability to relate to us. Who would want
                              to put anything, however sophisticated, in charge of any aspect of our life if
                              it does not have the ability to truly relate to us - this ability is an essential
                              requirement for many of the roles one might want agents for.

                              References

                               [1] Aydede. Language of Thought Hypothesis: State of the Art, 1999.
                                  http://humanities.uchicago.edu/faculty/aydede/LOTH.SEP.html
                               [2] Aydede, M. and Güzeldere, G. Consciousness, Intentionality, and Intelligence: Some
                                  Foundational Issues for Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical
                                  Artificial Intelligence, forthcoming.
                               [3] Barlow, H. The Social Role of Consciousness - Commentary on Bridgeman on Con-
                                  sciousness. Psycoloquy 3(19), Consciousness (4), 1992.
                               [4] Bickhard,M.H.and Terveen L. Foundational Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Cog-
                                  nitive Science, Impasse and Solution. New York: Elsevier Scientific, 1995.
                               [5] Bridgeman, B. On the Evolution of Consciousness and Language, Psycoloquy 3(15),
                                  Consciousness (1), 1992.
                               [6] Bridgeman, B. The Social Bootstrapping of Human Consciousness - Reply to Barlow on
                                  Bridgeman on Consciousness, Psycoloquy 3(20), Consciousness (5), 1992.
                               [7] Burns, T. R. and Engdahl, E. The Social Construction of Consciousness Part 2: Individual
                                  Selves, Self-Awareness, and Reflectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2:166-184,
                                  1998.
                               [8] Dennett, D. C. The Origin of Selves, Cogito, 3:163-173, 1989.
                               [9] Drescher, G. L. Made-up Minds, a Constructivist Approach to Artificial Intelligence.
                                  Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
                              [10] Edmonds, B. Social Embeddedness and Agent Development. Proc. UKMAS’98, Manch-
                                  ester, 1998.
                                  http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/cpmrep46.html
                              [11] Edmonds, B. Capturing Social Embeddedness: a Constructivist Approach. Adaptive Be-
                                  havior, 7(3/4): 323-347, 1999.
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65